3AW LIVE: Tom Elliott checks in with Avi Yemini on U.S. election tour
Rebel News reporter gives an Australian audience insight into American voters' sentiments in the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
Rebel News reporter Avi Yemini shared his observations from weeks of interviewing Americans about the upcoming U.S. presidential election, in an interview today with 3AW interview with Tom Elliott.
Despite what the mainstream media is calling a "tight race" between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris in national polls, Avi gave Tom an insight to the strong sentiment on the ground favouring Trump, particularly in key swing states.
Tom started by noting that while Harris may poll well in Democratic strongholds, Trump is performing strongly in pivotal swing states like Ohio.
"If you win California, whether you win it with 51% or 100%, you get the same number of Electoral College votes," Tom observed. "Trump, I am told, is polling well in the so-called swing states ... and that seems to me that he's more likely to win." Avi concurred, explaining that many Americans he has spoken to on his tour across America hold different views on who they want to win versus who they think will win.
Reflecting on his cross-country interviews, Avi described a noticeable energy among Trump supporters, including some who typically vote Democratic.
“There are honest Democrats ... who concede that they don't think she’s going to win,” Avi said, adding that many lifelong Democrats he met have serious concerns about Harris’s ability to secure a victory.
When asked about the main reasons Americans might support Trump, Avi pointed to significant issues such as immigration and the economy. He noted that several voters reported economic difficulties over the past four years, contrasting their struggles with the financial stability they experienced under Trump’s administration. He also noted widespread frustration over immigration, mentioning that even residents of typically Democratic states like New York voiced concerns about illegal immigration.
Avi also noted U.S. voters’ distrust in mainstream media, suggesting that an increasing number of Americans feel disillusioned by biased coverage.
“The average person just thinks that they’re being lied to so much about everything,” Avi remarked. He cited recent Democratic comparisons of Trump to controversial historical figures, including Kamala Harris reportedly likening Trump to Adolf Hitler.
Avi described a massive pro-Trump rally in New York, typically a Democratic stronghold, where thousands gathered in a demonstration that he called “the most diverse crowd.”
He pointed out the irony of the Democrats’ efforts to liken Trump’s rallies to historical fascist gatherings, noting that many attendees were Jewish.
Throughout his travels, Avi said he has found that Harris has struggled to connect with the public in the same way Trump has.
Follow Avi's journey across America:
SPONSOR
COMMENTS
-
Robin Naismith commented 2024-11-02 13:07:58 -0400I’ll check it out
-
Howard Mirkin commented 2024-11-01 04:48:36 -0400Robin, to see the connections try some searches for things like smart, sustainable, 15 minute cities and you will see the WEF keep popping up depending on the search engine. I prefer freespoke.com, but there are others that are pretty good, like Mojeek, tusksearch and others.
People need to be aware that a privacy search engine is very different from an biased/unbiased search engine. None of them can be completely unbiased, but some at least try to show whether the results are left, right or center.
https://freespoke.com/search/web?q=SMART+SUSTAINABLE+15+MINUTE+CITIES
https://tusksearch.com/search?q=SMART%20SUSTAINABLE%2015%20MINUTE%20CITIES&p=1&l=right
https://www.mojeek.com/search?q=SMART%2C+SUSTAINABLE%2C+15+MINUTE+CITIES -
Robin Naismith commented 2024-11-01 00:18:49 -0400Very good to know Howard and will certainly check the site out
-
Howard Mirkin commented 2024-10-31 16:26:01 -0400Here is a video that explains a lot of what is going on https://www.bitchute.com/video/Dx4imFqRKygW/
-
Howard Mirkin commented 2024-10-31 15:41:38 -0400Robin, Anything is possible until it is too late.
If you want to try a little experiment, take a look at the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) at https://www.myclimate.org/en/information/faq/faq-detail/what-are-the-sustainable-development-goals-sdgs/
Then think about what we have been told by the UN/WEF that we have to do to meet the goals and “solve” global warming, such as stop farming, kill all cows (ending the cattle species), stop eating dairy, drive only EVs, etc. (until no private vehicles are allowed in about 2035), purchase only 3 clothing items/year. Some of the SDGs are marketing tools to con the gullible and others are actions that would decimate humanity.
Then take each SDG and think about how to achieve it. For example SDG 1 is No Poverty. The obvious solution is no people when no food or insufficient quantities are allowed. Getting rid of CO2 means that inter alia plant life dies. Eating insects is hardly likely to end poverty, specially in the winter time. .
You can do this for most of the SDGs (not all) and the answer comes out No More People.
How do we get to no more people?
1. Total financial control through digital IDs linked to ESG scores in turn linked to a single centrally controlled programmable digital currency. The state will be able to confiscate all funds of every person at will.
2. Near total surveillance 24/7, inside and outside, by spy cameras, drones, our own smartphones, other devices, “neighborly” snitches, etc.
At this point we will all be slaves of those who control the means of production. (Is it possible that the programmers and AI usurp the total control from the politicians? Maybe).
3. As total control is achieved, such concepts as smart cities are likely to be used to isolate people from the rest of the world and massacre them by starvation, poison gases, military weapons, diseases and poisoned vaccines.
4. It may not even be necessary to use smart cities as concentration camps once the people are turned into zombie slaves.
Next we can look at more SDGs:
SDG 2 Zero Hunger: Solution: No people
SDG 3: Good health and well being: Marketing tool – fodder for fools.
SDG 4: Quality Education: Marketing tool – why have schools FOR SLAVES unless they are needed for indoctrination?
SDG 5: Gender equality: Another con. People are only equal in death. This is really an attempt to cau8se hate and discontent about gender to cause gender confusion and to make men feminine and women more masculine. Why? No babies means more depopulation. This is probably why the replacement rate is dropping so much in the west and the fact that it is increasing in Muslim countries indicates that the globalists intend to erase the white race.
Here are more that someone else can work on. Look for what is not written as well as what is.
SDG 6: Clean water and sanitation: ___________
SDG 7: Affordable and clean energy _________________
SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth ____________
SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure ____________
SDG 10: Reduced inequalities ____________
SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities ____________
SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production ____________
SDG 13: Climate Action ____________
SDG 14: Life below water ____________
SDG 15: Life on land ____________
SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions ____________
SDG 17: Partners for the goals
____________
I see nothing about the people choosing their leaders. Schwab has already said that there will be no more elections. After all, who will need elections in Utopia (or when dead)?
Not very pleasant thoughts, but each one of these is being implemented some place on earth as I type. -
Robin Naismith commented 2024-10-31 14:07:42 -0400I hear what your saying Howard and I honestly think when regular peoples are pushed too far by governments,then tend to end up finding their spines and they end up taking a stand against tyranny and they fight back in any way they can
-
Howard Mirkin commented 2024-10-31 12:22:47 -0400That is true, but between Mao and Stalin who both died of old age as far as we know, they murdered over 100 million people. The WEF/UN, etc., want to and are capable of murdering billions, perhaps without anything blowing up or bullets fired, and relatively few people are even aware they exist. Starving people to death does not take all that long. The point is that the number of people involved is irrelevant – it is the number they can murder that matters, and mankind to a large extent has been conditioned to avoid violence at all costs. Men are becoming like women and that is no accident. In addition, if their plan to enslave everyone first is not totally disrupted, there won’t be anyone with the means to destroy them. If everyone becomes a slave under intense surveillance 24/7 and everything is done by remote control, who will be able to fight back against whom? Make a move that the spy devices and the AI interpret as unacceptable or hostile, and boom – you’re dead. I cannot be certain exactly what will happen but all the signs point to something much like the scenario I am envisioning. But again, it comes back to whether people will wake up in time, organize and take action.
-
Robin Naismith commented 2024-10-31 10:57:26 -0400Howard I get what your saying here and I am just saying that these richy scumbags out there that think that they are totally u-touchable and that is not true at all because we all know about the history on some individuals that pushed their dictatorship crap too far and look what happen to a good many of them, a lot of them met a very grissly end
-
Howard Mirkin commented 2024-10-31 10:01:50 -0400Robin, I did not refer to anyone as smart in my post. I would not call Hitler smart either, because he lost. Stalin and Mao were also evil, but clever enough to die of old age (at least that is what we have been told). About 150 million people died because of those non-smart people. Hitler wrote Main Kampf and essentially told people what he was going to do in general. Stalin starved millions in Ukraine and no one tried to stop him. Mao starbed many 10s of millions of his own people in China – no one was able to interfere. . Today the evil ones tell us what they are going to do. They couch it in less harsh words, but the meaning is the same. Whether they are cowards or not is irrelevant. They are telling us what they intend to do, so I don’t think cowards is the right word. They feel immune because they have organized world leaders into cooperating. Of course they have bunkers to hide in as well, but that is just common sense if you are going to destroy much of the world and survive. Anyway, I am just trying to make people aware so they can organize at the local level and take appropriate actions to their situations. And by the way those people are extremely wealthy as they include many multi billionaires like gates, Fink, the head of Pfizer, and many more.
-
Robin Naismith commented 2024-10-31 08:57:45 -0400Well Howard,I honestly wouldn’t be too sure of that at all. The higher ups in governments, Millitaries and other areas like to go about bragging that they are smart,but unfortunetly that doesn’t exactly make it true because I have to believe that these individuals are just full of hot air & they also have Shit for brains
-
Howard Mirkin commented 2024-10-31 08:45:13 -0400I would not be so sure of that. The infiltrators are in very powerful positions in many governments, and governments own the military forces and weapons, which is why they do not want citizenry to have them. The planning for this has been ongoing for about 50 years. The technology (mRNA jabs, AI, the fake catastrophic Climate Change and school/media indoctrination have all contributed to making their objectives easier to achieve. A number of generals in the U.S. and Canada as well as other nations are among those who belong to the NWO (for lack of a better term). Many of them are in UN countries. Many of them are not known to be involved but from their actions in carrying out the destruction of free people it is clear they are, and I’m talking about the likes of Albanese in Australia, Biden, Harris. Milley in the USA, Trudeau and others in Canada, Charles and that commie PM in the UK. Just about anyone who kept pushing lockdowns, masking and mRNA jabs during and after COVID, the entire left wing media who have been lying to the public as people keep dying every day are involved.
-
Robin Naismith commented 2024-10-31 04:40:41 -0400Yeah,you are probably right about that indeed Howard and if this does some how come to pass,then I could certainly see which side would probably win the war. It would be the side that hasn’t been brainwashed by the Garbage that is being spewed by corrupt medias & governments as well
-
Howard Mirkin commented 2024-10-31 03:30:35 -0400A civil war is a possibility. The left is out for total power, because that is what leftists stand for, i.e., controlling the means of production means to control just about every aspect of living. The right just wants freedom with minimal government. I explain what will likely happen if the left wins in my most recent post at https://www.rebelnews.com/arrivecan_emails_destroyed_only_days_after_they_were_sought
-
Robin Naismith commented 2024-10-31 02:36:02 -0400Obviously there’s a lot of differences with the voting situation between Trump & Kamala Harris and if things keep going the way that they are,I could certainly see things go as far as possible Civil war
-
Howard Mirkin commented 2024-10-30 13:42:26 -0400One thing is most worrisome about the election: The left has no morals, no scruples, no ethics and will cheat in every way possible as often as need be. They have bought many judges who throw out clear cases of election fraud, like ruling that illegal voters must remain on the roles. If the left steals another election or too many ignorant voters give them a win, the United States as a free country is doomed as the left will go full globalist. And if the United States is no longer free, it is doubtful whether any other countries will stand up to the globalists. All the people will become slaves of the elites.