Alberta Fact Check: Even Ottawa can’t keep its story straight on Alberta and the Clarity Act

For decades, federal politicians treated the Clarity Act like sacred constitutional doctrine anytime Quebec sovereignty came up.

 

source: The Canadian Press / Adrian Wyld

The federal government is now arguing with itself over whether the Clarity Act even applies to Alberta’s planned sovereignty referendum.

Justice Minister Sean Fraser told reporters Ottawa is reviewing Alberta’s referendum question to determine whether it complies with the Clarity Act. 

Then Prime Minister Mark Carney reportedly said the exact opposite, claiming the Clarity Act “will not apply” to Alberta’s referendum question at all. 

So apparently Ottawa is simultaneously reviewing Alberta’s referendum under the Clarity Act while also insisting the Clarity Act doesn’t apply.

Crystal clear! 

The Clarity Act was passed in 2000 after Quebec’s near-separation vote in 1995. The law was specifically designed to govern how Ottawa would handle any provincial secession referendum. In fact, the legislation explicitly applies to all provinces, not just Quebec. 

That’s what makes this sudden confusion so politically revealing.

For decades, federal politicians treated the Clarity Act like sacred constitutional doctrine anytime Quebec sovereignty came up. Now that Alberta wants a vote, Ottawa suddenly seems desperate to invent a distinction without a difference.

Fraser’s argument appears to hinge on Alberta’s question asking whether the province should begin the process toward a future binding referendum, rather than immediately declaring separation. 

But constitutional lawyer Keith Wilson says Carney is “wrong about the law,” arguing the 1998 Supreme Court Secession Reference still governs any provincial attempt to leave Confederation.

Meanwhile, even the Bloc Québécois is mocking Ottawa’s mixed messaging. Bloc MPs blasted the idea of federal interference in Alberta’s referendum wording as “anti-democratic.” 

And that may be the biggest political problem for Ottawa here.

Every time federal politicians suggest Albertans need Ottawa lawyers to approve whether they’re allowed to ask constitutional questions, separatist sentiment grows.

Quebec was allowed two sovereignty referendums, national commissions, and endless constitutional negotiations.

Alberta gets contradictory talking points from Ottawa before the campaign has even started.

Remigration Now!

8,746 signatures
Goal: 15,000 signatures

Canada’s immigration system must put Canadian citizens, Canadian workers and Canadian values first. Temporary foreign workers and international students should be required to leave when their permits expire, citizenship should not be granted to those who support terrorism or reject Canada’s laws and values, and the federal government must reverse the damaging consequences of unchecked mass migration. We call on Canada’s leaders to restore order, enforce the rules, and to protect Canadian jobs and communities.

Will you sign?

Sheila Gunn Reid

Chief Reporter

Sheila Gunn Reid is the Editor-in-Chief, Alberta Bureau Chief, member of the board of directors, and host of The Gunn Show at Rebel News. Sheila also serves as President of the Independent Press Gallery of Canada. A mother of three and longtime conservative activist, Sheila is the author of bestselling books, including her most recent release, Independence Blueprint: What Alberta Can Learn From Quebec.

https://mybook.to/sheila

COMMENTS

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.