Alberta government COVID-19 review calls for immediate halt to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, citing safety concerns

A new report commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith calls for the suspension of modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for healthy children and teenagers, highlighting serious safety concerns, gaps in data, and the need for a more cautious, evidence-based approach to future pandemic responses.

The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy.

The review was initiated in 2022 under the leadership of Dr. Gary Davidson, a clinical lead in emergency medicine in central Alberta. Dr. Davidson was tasked with evaluating the pandemic’s response, focusing on various aspects such as non-pharmaceutical interventions (masking and lockdowns), the accuracy of predictive modelling, and the role regulatory bodies played in the response. Experts like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Byram Bridle, and Dr. David Speicher contributed to the investigation, each bringing their expertise to bear on a comprehensive assessment of pandemic policies.

Among the most striking findings of the report is the task force’s criticism of Health Canada’s decision-making process for the rushed to market novel modified RNA injections. The group points out that there were “significant gaps” in the data supporting the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines. In fact, Health Canada has failed to disclose whether a proper risk assessment was ever conducted to justify the widespread use of these vaccines in individuals under 18, particularly considering the lack of long-term clinical data.

One of the most disturbing aspects highlighted in the review is the data from Pfizer’s post-authorization trial. The report reveals that 1,223 deaths and 42,086 injuries were reported within just four days of vaccination. Notably, nearly half of these adverse events occurred in individuals aged 18-50—those at negligible risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. This troubling information calls into question the overall safety profile of the vaccines, especially in young and healthy populations.

The report also discusses the known risks associated with the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to deliver the modified RNA and spike protein into cells. These synthetic fat molecules have a well-documented toxicity profile, and there are concerns about the long-term health impacts of repeated doses. Furthermore, the review raises alarms over the increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, two heart conditions that can have lifelong and potentially fatal consequences, particularly for young individuals.

Another critical aspect addressed in the Alberta report is the rushed approval process for these vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization. The review underscores that while such a pathway is easier to navigate in times of crisis, it becomes incredibly challenging to reverse decisions once questions about safety arise. The task force also points out the difficulty of obtaining accurate data on vaccine safety and efficacy within Alberta’s publicly funded healthcare system, making it almost impossible to conduct independent analysis or verification of safety claims made.

The Alberta report draws attention to the discrepancies in the clinical trials, which were plagued by inadequate follow-up, missing data, and conflicts of interest. The interim findings of Pfizer’s clinical trial revealed that 21 deaths occurred in the vaccinated group compared to 17 in the placebo group, with an alarming 3.7-fold increase in cardiac events. Moreover, the report highlights issues with underreporting adverse events, noting that only 1-10% of adverse events were properly documented.

Even more concerning is the data on pregnant women, which reveals a devastating 87.5% fetal/neonatal mortality rate in the limited trials conducted. These findings, alongside the acknowledged risks of the lipid nanoparticle delivery system, underscore the need for a re-evaluation of the vaccines' safety profile.

Despite the mounting evidence, the public health narrative has largely ignored these critical concerns, dismissing them as misinformation. However, the Alberta review demands transparency, accountability, and a rigorous risk-benefit analysis moving forward. As the province calls for a halt to the use of these vaccines in healthy young individuals, the question remains: will these calls be heeded, or will the push for blanket vaccination recommendations continue unchecked?

The review emphasizes the need for a more cautious, evidence-based approach in future pandemic responses, prioritizing transparency and informed consent over knee-jerk policies.

PETITION: No More Shots!

53,516 signatures
Goal: 75,000 signatures

I demand Canada’s Minister of Health, Mark Holland, remove the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from the market. Health Canada has confirmed the presence of an undisclosed plasmid, raising serious safety concerns and invalidating informed consent. I also support the Government of Alberta’s call to halt the vaccines, especially for healthy populations, including young adults and children.

Will you sign?

Tamara Ugolini

Senior Editor

Tamara Ugolini is an informed choice advocate turned journalist whose journey into motherhood sparked her passion for parental rights and the importance of true informed consent. She critically examines the shortcomings of "Big Policy" and its impact on individuals, while challenging mainstream narratives to empower others in their decision-making.

COMMENTS

Showing 7 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Shaun Morrison
    commented 2025-01-29 12:27:19 -0500
    There was a study on corona viruses I read a few years back, “natural immunity,” the human population has been exposed to the"corona" virus for thousands of years of evolution and cary that marker, entre natural immunity. Yes I am over simplifying it, but we have all been tricked, fooled, coerced, threatened, abused, punished, harmed and killed by the actions of a few, and then there’s the generational fallout and the blood supply system fallout, this is far from over.

    Here is the kicker, we know who is responsible, now where is the accountability? Here is a question, who’s child, haw many more people must pay for the greedy sins of a few, or do people deep down have no morales and are happy waiting till it’s their time?

    The fact that we still see people walking around with paper over their faces is like standing in front of a shotgun with a pie plate in front of their face hoping there will be a positive outcome, one would have to be somewhat braindead to do this or continue to do this.

    We have a big building in Ottawa with a pointy roof full of Bobbleheads wearing pie plates, we don’t need any more.
  • Don Hrehirchek
    commented 2025-01-29 11:32:33 -0500
    Lee, may Our lights shine brighter and brighter every day as these scandal’s are brought forth day by day . There are many a thing wrong in Our society, they can be “fixed”. Just need the will of the people.
  • Lee Everts
    commented 2025-01-29 11:24:41 -0500
    I’m just so dreadfully sorry for the woman whom I believe was refused an organ transplant because she’d not been vaccinated. At all levels, she was denied. But here the government is raising an alarm regarding those vaccinations. It’s not right. Regardless, we’re on our way, acknowledging the horror of everything tied to these vaccinations.
  • Jerrold Lundgard
    commented 2025-01-29 06:52:45 -0500
    There were too many unanswered questions prior to the approval and release of MNRA substances (some of which were contaminated with other genetic material).
    1) The words “herd immunity” were heard often. Covid19 was not in the population long enough to discover if there was “herd immunity” prior to the release of the substance
    2) The MNRA Substance was untested and the side effects (long and short term) were unknown. In fact the mutation of the Covid19 virus was unknown.
    3) the MNRA substance was not a true vaccine as it was a spike protein on the virus that allowed crossing a human cell wall in the human respiratory system and did not trigger an immune reaction to the virus that took over the cell once inside.
    3) Neither infection or the MNRA injection worked to stop infection of the virus.
    4) The science behind the development of the MNRA substance, as well as the long term effects of the MNRA substance, as well has the process that left undocumented genetic protein strands in some off the MNRA cultures was extremely questionable
    MNRA is a genetically active material and a strand of MNRA can give unexpected genetic triggers in the human body including possible mutations in sperm in folks who are infected, Either from the Covid virus or from the MNRA shot injected.
    History shows that Covid19 was “just anther flu” and the most deadly strains died with the hosts before transmission, nor did covid19 reach the levels of death associated with the Spanish flu of 1919 – 1923 The Spanish flu virus is still with us. Those with lesser immunity are dead.
    The covid virus is still with us, those with Lesser immunity are dead. Herd immunity has turned Covid into just another flu
    The science is not in on the effects of MNRA injections and may not be totally understood for generations.
    Humans share a significant amount of DNA with yeast. A MNRA substance that may mutate / activate that shared DNA may be very dangerous to the human genome .
    But greed, avarice, and lack of conscience trump caution.
  • Don Hrehirchek
    commented 2025-01-28 20:54:24 -0500
    Follow the money. It may be hard to do, but I am sure there are the higher ups are involved. Just My observation from My arm chair.
  • Evelyn Crellin
    commented 2025-01-28 16:39:24 -0500
    Thank you for all the reporting you have done on this subject. I know Ken Drysdale from Manitoba did a lot of work on this all across Canada with his wife . It is honestly disgraceful that the Federal Government hasn’t done a complete investigation into this. Why that is I don’t understand. I’m thinking that they must have been okay with it for some reason or other. Evelyn Crellin
  • Shaun Morrison
    commented 2025-01-28 16:03:55 -0500
    And yet,
    Here in BC the radios keep playing the covax adds, where is the accountability, are the radio stations now going to take the legal responsibility for false advertising and any harm or deaths that arise from the covax. I’m thinking ANYONE still pushing this is now commercially and personally responsible for harm.

    There are no disclaimers mentioned in the adds, unlike tv drug adds which do, time for a whole lot of accountability on all levels.
  • Gary Hruschak
    followed this page 2025-01-28 15:15:09 -0500