B.C. Conservatives DEMAND Supreme Court ruling on First Nation land title rights
B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad stated Tuesday that reconciliation must not infringe on private property rights, urging immediate federal intervention.

The B.C. government and Official Opposition oppose a B.C. Supreme Court ruling granting Cowichan Tribes land title and fishing rights in parts of the Lower Mainland, citing property rights. The province plans to appeal.
“Reconciliation cannot occur at the cost of private property rights. Conservatives have been clear on this matter,” B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad said Tuesday. He urged federal intervention without delay.
Though only briefly mentioned in the 863-page decision, some legal scholars believe the court’s ruling could impact the interpretation of a sweeping UN indigenous pact in Canada, while others disagree.
UNDRIP, a contentious issue for years, is a non-binding document outlining indigenous rights, including self-determination, land ownership, and consent. It grants indigenous peoples the right to restitution or compensation for land taken without their free, prior, and informed consent.
Rustad previously said that UNDRIP was "established for conditions in other countries—not Canada." His past comments on proposed Land Act amendments, aligning with UNDRIP, called it an "assault" on private property rights.
The NDP, critical of the MLA, now worry the ruling threatens private property rights and economic stability. Rustad notes that a lack of clarity leaves homeowners, farmers, small businesses, and investors "in limbo," eroding confidence and stalling projects.
The B.C. government plans to appeal the decision, seeking to stay its implementation. Attorney General Niki Sharma stated, "We disagree strongly with the decision."
Cowichan Tribes celebrated a "historic victory" over alleged settlement land, but the federal government, City of Richmond, and Vancouver Fraser Port Authority opposed the ruling. Musqueam and Tsawwassen First Nations, co-defendants, also denied Cowichan's aboriginal title in shared territories.
Justice Barbara Young stated that UNDRIP is based on Indigenous self-determination and the strength of their legal systems, arguing that denying indigenous title contradicts reconciliation.
However, Constitutional law professor Dwight Newman highlighted that the UNDRIP clause in the judgment addresses the B.C. Land Titles Act's safeguarding of private property against aboriginal title claims.
Ottawa sees UNDRIP as a reconciliation roadmap, addressing systemic issues and outlining Indigenous rights and land claims, though transfers need separate rulings.
Both federal (2021) and B.C. provincial (2019) law enacted the 2007 declaration. B.C. is the only province to do so, with its law (Section 3) requiring provincial laws to align with the declaration.
Alex Dhaliwal
Journalist and Writer
Alex Dhaliwal is a Political Science graduate from the University of Calgary. He has actively written on relevant Canadian issues with several prominent interviews under his belt.
Help fund Alex's journalism!
COMMENTS
-
Lance Humphries commented 2025-08-28 00:51:41 -0400Well that’s your one mistake. Conservatives are honest brokers, so they continuously forget that left wing communists are not!! They don’t deal in good faith. Reconciliation isn’t about reconciling anything.. Think of it as the enforcement arm of UNDRIP, to wreak the intended havoc! Asserting we need to reconcile, is a concession we did something wrong. You’re acquiescing to the scheme! We’ve done nothing wrong, we have nothing to reconcile!! Never mind that life’s not perfect. Don’t fall for that trap!!
The best way to undermine this scheme is to deny Indians the use of anything the White man invented FIRST!! Which is the entire modern world!! No electricity, no running water, no transportation, no communications (except smoke signals) . . . you get the picture!!
They weren’t even here first. Do a search for lost cities under the Great Lakes dating back 2,000 years before the Japanese crossed the land bridge. Oh, speaking of which, maybe we should give Canada to Japan. Well why not? Aboriginals are of Japanese descent. Surely Japan has a claim too!!
Good reporting!! -
Lance Humphries followed this page 2025-08-28 00:51:41 -0400