Fact Check: A vote for Option 2 on Question 10 is not necessarily a vote for independence

A significant portion of Albertans will be choosing Option 2 to send a message to the federal government.

 

source: X / DavidMcLA (left)

Former Kim Campbell campaign adviser David McLaughlin posted on X: “Having failed to convince Albertans thus far to opt for separation, the leader of the secessionist pack is scrambling to gaslight voters on what Option 2 is. it is a vote for a separation referendum, period.”

Option 2 is not “a vote for a separation referendum, period,” and it is certainly not a vote for independence. That is the claim federalists keep flattening into a slogan. The ballot does not say that. The Order in Council does not say that. Elections Alberta does not say that.

Independence supporters are certainly supporting Option 2. But a large segment of Albertans are choosing Option 2 as a means of sending a message to Ottawa.

Stay Free Alberta petitioned to invoke a binary and binding referendum on Alberta independence, and it was shunted by the courts. The question facing Albertans on October 19 is mushy and, at its strongest, offers a non-binding mandate to the provincial government to commence the process to hold a binding independence referendum.

An Option 2 majority does not take Alberta out of Canada. It does not trigger the Secession Reference duty on Ottawa to negotiate the terms of departure. It does not schedule Independence Day. It tells Edmonton to begin the legal groundwork for a future binding question. If that future vote is ever held, Albertans would still have to choose to leave or stay. That is when a vote for independence would actually exist.

Calling that “gaslighting” is a campaign tactic, not a reading of the text. The gaslight runs the other way: treat a non-binding process question as if it were a declaration of independence, then dare anyone who wants leverage with Ottawa to prove they are still Canadian. Plenty of voters can want a stronger provincial hand without wanting a new country.

Voting to begin the process for a binding independence vote isn’t a minor decision. It could indeed lead to true and full independence for Alberta from the federation. Reframing the question being presented to Albertan citizens today as being one triggering secession is political posturing and disingenuous, however.

Help fund our independent reporting on Alberta's independence movement!

Rebel News is stepping up where the legacy media have failed. We've assigned Tamara Lich to follow the Alberta independence movement as it unfolds — not from a government-funded newsroom in Toronto, but on the ground with the people actually shaping it. We don’t take a cent of the Liberals' media bailouts, which means we rely entirely on viewers like you to make this journalism possible. If you want Albertans to have a fair voice in a debate the establishment would rather crush, please chip in today and help us keep this reporting going strong.

Amount
$

Donation frequency

Cory Morgan

Cory Morgan is an Alberta-based columnist, political commentator, and longtime advocate for Western Canadian independence. He is the author of the recently updated book The Sovereigntist’s Handbook, a grassroots guide for independence supporters and political activists.

http://sovereigntistshandbook.com/

COMMENTS

Showing 2 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2026-09-28 22:53:48 -0400
    All the remainers have is fear and nostalgia. They use those to fool low-information voters, like the seniors I ride on the bus with, into thinking option 2 is a vote for disaster.
  • Bernhard Jatzeck
    commented 2026-09-28 13:56:07 -0400
    The “remainers” must be desperate if they need the advice from someone from the “Kim!” Campbell era. She was the singular worst Progressive Conservative prime minister, as the party was reduced to two seats in the House of Commons in the 1993 election.