Fact Check: Forever Canadian raised $48,345 in a week. What funded the months before?

The question for investigators is straightforward: how did Forever Canadian pay for its earlier activities, and did any money or donated goods and services qualify as referendum advertising contributions at the time?

 

Facebook / Thomas A. Lukaszuk

Thomas Lukaszuk’s Forever Canadian group reported $48,345 in contributions in one week after reporting zero since registering as a referendum third-party advertiser in June.

That is a remarkable fundraising burst. but it also puts a brighter light on the months when the group was campaigning exactly as it is now, but reporting no contributions. 

Lukaszuk has argued that his earlier national-unity messaging fell outside Alberta’s referendum advertising rules because it did not promote a specific ballot option. Last week, he announced Forever Canadian would explicitly campaign for Option 1, to keep Alberta in Canada. The group’s first reported contributions followed.

Rebel News has filed a complaint asking Elections Alberta to examine Forever Canadian’s compliance. It also sought a court order to speed up the complaint before the October 19 vote; a judge dismissed that request, and the process will follow a timeline that doesn't align with the referendum campaign. 

The question for investigators is straightforward: how did Forever Canadian pay for its earlier activities, and did any money or donated goods and services qualify as referendum advertising contributions at the time?

Elections Alberta says advertising contributions can include money, goods and services received before or after registration. Registered referendum advertisers must file weekly contribution reports, including reports showing no activity. 

The $48,345 one-week figure could be credible; however, Forever Canadian's earlier zero-dollar reports deserve scrutiny. The sudden surge does not establish a violation, but it makes a full accounting of Forever Canadian’s campaign finances all the more important before Albertans vote.

Help fund our independent reporting on Alberta's independence movement!

Rebel News is stepping up where the legacy media have failed. We've assigned Tamara Lich to follow the Alberta independence movement as it unfolds — not from a government-funded newsroom in Toronto, but on the ground with the people actually shaping it. We don’t take a cent of the Liberals' media bailouts, which means we rely entirely on viewers like you to make this journalism possible. If you want Albertans to have a fair voice in a debate the establishment would rather crush, please chip in today and help us keep this reporting going strong.

Amount
$

Donation frequency

Sheila Gunn Reid

Chief Reporter

Sheila Gunn Reid is the Editor-in-Chief, Alberta Bureau Chief, member of the board of directors, and host of The Gunn Show at Rebel News. Sheila also serves as President of the Independent Press Gallery of Canada. A mother of three and longtime conservative activist, Sheila is the author of bestselling books, including her most recent release, Independence Blueprint: What Alberta Can Learn From Quebec.

https://mybook.to/sheila

COMMENTS

Showing 3 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2026-09-28 22:49:21 -0400
    Lukas-thug needs to declare ALL his funds, not just from now until October 19th.
  • Bernhard Jatzeck
    commented 2026-09-28 13:57:02 -0400
    Probably money from Soros or the WEF. The Forever Canadian campaign is something they’ve been known to back.
  • Daryl Wall
    commented 2026-09-28 13:33:56 -0400
    This referendum is so rigged that it is almost a lost cause. Between Elections Alberta (deliberate?) incompetence, Premier Smith very publicly expressing a preference for Option 1, and forcing her caucus to do the the same and the Liberal left and the Media (but I repeat myself) all firmly aligned against Independence, it doesn’t have a chance. Add that to the fact that even if Option 2 should win the day (it would have to be with 75%+ of the votes, I think) then all it says is that the Government “Should,” not “Shall,” “Should.” The Government SHOULD do a lot of things. It SHOULD balance the budget. It SHOULD impose fair and equitable taxation. It SHOULD live up to its election promises of an Alberta Police Force, and an Alberta Pension Plan. It SHOULD establish an Alberta Revenue Agency to take absolute control over all taxes collected. It SHOULD do a lot of things…but it doesn’t. Even if Option 2 does win the day the fact that it SHOULD follow the directions of the electorate doesn’t mean that it will.