Friendship fallout: Woman fined $10,000 for private comments to trans friend, challenges tribunal ruling

Constitutional lawyer Marty Moore, representing Kirstin Olsen, called the ruling an alarming overreach.

 

The Canadian Press / Nono Shen

A British Columbia woman is taking the province’s Human Rights Tribunal to court after being slapped with a $10,000 fine for expressing personal concerns to a longtime friend about a planned medical procedure.

Kirstin Olsen has filed a petition with the BC Supreme Court challenging the Tribunal’s January 2025 ruling, which penalized her for what it called discriminatory speech during a private conversation with her then-friend, Theresa (Terry) Wiebe, who identifies as transgender.

The two had been close for years. From 2014 to 2018, Olsen even let Wiebe live in a motorhome on her property for a modest $200 a month. In 2017, when Wiebe told Olsen she planned to undergo a mastectomy as part of her gender transition, Olsen—who had witnessed her own mother’s struggle with breast cancer and a double mastectomy—expressed discomfort and concern about the decision.

Despite the conversation, the friendship continued for a time. Olsen later even paid for Wiebe to return to BC from the Yukon after a hospitalization related to hormone therapy. But in 2018, after tensions with others living on the property, Olsen asked Wiebe to leave. The Tribunal later found the eviction was unrelated to Wiebe’s transgender status.

However, the Tribunal still ruled Olsen’s earlier comments about the mastectomy constituted discrimination and caused “injury to dignity”—resulting in the $10,000 fine. Notably, the ruling made no reference to Olsen’s Charter right to freedom of expression.

“The Tribunal never considered the impact of its decision on free speech,” reads Olsen’s legal challenge, filed March 21, 2025.

Constitutional lawyer Marty Moore, representing Olsen, called the ruling an alarming overreach.

“It is very concerning to see a government tribunal policing private communications between friends and imposing a $10,000 penalty,” Moore said. “A comment of concern for a friend is very different than evicting someone from their home based on race, religion, or sex. The Tribunal should focus on real discrimination—not turning personal conversations into punishable offences.”

Olsen’s case is a test of how far human rights commissions can reach into private life—and whether the right to express concern is now a finable offence in Canada.

Please help Rebel News fight back in Campaign 2025!

Rebel News is gearing up for a critical fight in the 2025 Canadian federal election, and we need your help to make it happen! As a fiercely independent voice, we’re committed to holding politicians accountable, exposing hidden agendas, and amplifying the issues that matter most to Canadians — without bowing to corporate or government pressure. But this battle takes resources: journalists on the ground, operating our digital billboard truck, legal defenses against censorship, and a platform to reach millions. We’re launching this crowdfund to ask our loyal fans — you, the rebels — to chip in and fuel our 2025 election campaign coverage. Every dollar brings us closer to cutting through the noise and defending freedom in Canada. Will you stand with us?

Amount
$

Sheila Gunn Reid

Chief Reporter

Sheila Gunn Reid is the Alberta Bureau Chief for Rebel News and host of the weekly The Gunn Show with Sheila Gunn Reid. She's a mother of three, conservative activist, and the author of best-selling books including Stop Notley.

COMMENTS

Showing 2 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2025-04-02 19:33:47 -0400
    What a racket! Claim to be transsexual and then weaponize even the slightest remark in the human rights court. But dishonesty does bite one in the butt. This trans woman will reap her bad decisions.
  • Crude Sausage
    commented 2025-04-02 17:34:10 -0400
    It seems like the lesson here is to terminate any friendship with transsexuals you might have because they WILL stab you in the back, given the chance.