Trudeau in a bulletproof vest: CBC guest blames free speech, Rebel News and yellow vests for threats

Posted by Sheila Gunn Reid on October 15, 2019

This weekend at a campaign stop in Mississauga, Justin Trudeau took the “unprecedented” step of wearing a bulletproof vest in response to a security threat. And the mainstream media has already put the blame on you and me.

I'm not a security expert, but I do think it's bizarre that if the threats were so deadly that Trudeau needed to pull on a flak jacket why the rest of the crowd of over 400 Liberals were not evacuated.

So far, we haven't heard of any arrests and we don't have any more information about what was going on behind the scenes.

But one Toronto morning host named Supriya Dwivedi knows the source of the security threat: It's our fault!

WATCH to see Dwivedi's full, uncut statements condemning Rebel News and other Canadians on the CBC's Power & Politics.

Most of our reporters have been subjected to violence and silencing, and that's why we've launched StopDeplatforming.com in order to use every legal method available to make sure these petty threats don't prevent us from getting our work done.

Do you like this Rebel News story?

Showing 27 reactions

Comment using

Facebook Twitter

Brian Bannister commented 2019-10-17 23:55:27 -0400
Your comments section is pretty funked up .
Brian Bannister commented 2019-10-17 23:54:24 -0400
None of your claims about this being a stunt have any merit. No sources at all, and please do not bring up the “Buffalo Chronicle” story or whatever that fake one was. If this were a real story The Rebel would be all over real news sites proclaiming it. But they aren’t . This is a joke. Completely fake.
Brian Bannister commented 2019-10-17 23:54:24 -0400
None of your claims about this being a stunt have any merit. No sources at all, and please do not bring up the “Buffalo Chronicle” story or whatever that fake one was. If this were a real story The Rebel would be all over real news sites proclaiming it. But they aren’t . This is a joke. Completely fake.
Brian Bannister commented 2019-10-17 23:54:23 -0400
None of your claims about this being a stunt have any merit. No sources at all, and please do not bring up the “Buffalo Chronicle” story or whatever that fake one was. If this were a real story The Rebel would be all over real news sites proclaiming it. But they aren’t . This is a joke. Completely fake.
Brian Bannister commented 2019-10-17 23:54:14 -0400
None of your claims about this being a stunt have any merit. No sources at all, and please do not bring up the “Buffalo Chronicle” story or whatever that fake one was. If this were a real story The Rebel would be all over real news sites proclaiming it. But they aren’t . This is a joke. Completely fake.
Brian Bannister commented 2019-10-17 23:54:08 -0400
None of your claims about this being a stunt have any merit. No sources at all, and please do not bring up the “Buffalo Chronicle” story or whatever that fake one was. If this were a real story The Rebel would be all over real news sites proclaiming it. But they aren’t . This is a joke. Completely fake.
Jamie MacMaster commented 2019-10-17 08:13:46 -0400
It’s just the Drama Queen doing a bit more theater.
Keith Barnes commented 2019-10-16 15:17:02 -0400
The PM is getting desperate, by wearing a bullet proof vest, he thinks he will attract the sympathy vote.
Keith Barnes commented 2019-10-16 15:16:41 -0400
The PM is getting desperate, by wearing a bullit proof vest, he thinks he will attract the sympathy vote.
Robert Raymond commented 2019-10-16 12:01:15 -0400
If there was a real threat, then Trudeau holds very little regard for the security of the people in the mob. It is the same disrespect for all Canadians and Canada.
His old man was the same, an elitist, anti-semite who held all Canadians in contempt!
Robert Raymond commented 2019-10-16 11:57:00 -0400
I saw a picture of Jussie Trudeau the grouper wearing a yellow vest. Is that yellow the same shade as the stripe down his back?
Robert Raymond commented 2019-10-16 11:09:31 -0400
Even Gadafi did not wear a bullet proof vest. Trudeau is a chicken sh??
dave sutton commented 2019-10-16 11:01:05 -0400
I hate to state the obvious but the vest only protects the chest while leaving the head exposed; which brings us to the next obvious fact. If Trudeau’s security detail were truly concerned about his safety then why didn’t they give him a ballistic helmet to wear? This does not inspire confidence in the RCMP.
Barb Morrison commented 2019-10-16 03:13:24 -0400
The Kevlar protective vest event was a theatrical staging contrived by Trudeau and the PMO to seek sympathy votes. It was nothing more and nothing less than the overactive ego of Trudeau demanding more attention with a “poor me” attitude.
The CBC is the Liberal propaganda outlet as demonstrated by their consistent use of pro-Liberal pro-Trudeau panelists, not one dissenting voice among them. They point their boney fingers and accuse everyone who disagrees with their totalitarian ideologies as racist, bigot, Islamaphobe, anti everything to do with gender and sexual preferences, unCanadian, Neanderthals etc……now they allege those who embrace truth, honesty and integrity are domestic terrorists! These hard core partisans haven’t provided Canadians with unbiased honest reporting for years! Clean your own house CBC it’s full of scavengers living off Canadian taxpayer dollars! As one of your employers…you’re fired!
Common Sense commented 2019-10-16 00:47:50 -0400
Supriya Dwivedi, calling Trudeau a traitor is not a death threat, as Liz pointed out, and it would cause no-one to don a vest, go to an event with hundreds of supporters, and give them the impression they are in imminent danger being in the same room with the traitor. Why did they even allow him in the building putting that which they are supposed to protect in danger? Why didn’t they empty the building first, bring in the dogs to clear it, then check every single person going in? Because they were all actors, no-one in security/military/police would ever do such a thing. Besides, in such close proximity with hundreds of people, you would have to wrap him in kevlar, and if it were an explosive of some kind, he would be done, along with pretty much everybody else in there. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it’s a DUCK!!!!
Liz Rosie commented 2019-10-16 00:10:56 -0400
Supriya Dwivedi, calling Trudeau a traitor is not a death threat, its accurate. If you actually believe what you are saying and not just repeating Gerald Butts projectile vomit, then you are no better. We’re not stupid, we know who’s lying.
Liz Rosie commented 2019-10-15 23:59:19 -0400
Staged.
No one believes Justin Trudeau and no one believes anything that comes from the CBC. No credibility. They can’t keep tricking people and spinning events and expect Canadians to continue swallowing their lies as truth. We know lies when we see them. We have had lots of experience thanks to the msm and the Liberals continual flow of codswallop.
How far will his stunts go? I don’t think its safe for anyone to be physically anywhere near a Trudeau event anymore. Who knows what kind of false flag event they might be choreographing.
Common Sense commented 2019-10-15 22:55:08 -0400
It was a performance plain and simple. They would have cleared the building immediately and brought in dogs. No one goes back in until the building has been cleared. Anyone and everyone going back in is searched. Notice from the videos no security other than a walmart greeter at the entrance. He did this simply for sympathy because he is in trouble. It was staged, it was an act by a drama teacher, a very poor one at that. They never ever would have let him in if there was a threat. The final beauty, if it was real, he put all those people, his supporters, men, women, children at extreme risk, and all he is wearing is a vest; mingling with them up close.
mark gayle commented 2019-10-15 22:23:50 -0400
Rebel News. A decent news outlet for decent people.
Jan G commented 2019-10-15 21:35:22 -0400
If this CBC guest drank a little less caffeine, perhaps she could actually think clearly.
If they are accusing Rebel News for being responsible for this, then they had better present a criminal in handcuffs, otherwise, this is defamatory and libel.

" Defamation refers to harming another person’s reputation by making a false written or oral statement about that person to a third party. Defamation law is not about protecting pride; it is about protecting reputation and offering restitution to people whose reputations have been wrongly damaged."
“Libel: defamation with a permanent record, such as an email, a radio or TV broadcast, a newspaper, a website posting, etc.”
https://www.cjfe.org/defamation_libel_and_slander_what_are_my_rights_to_free_expression
(Note: though this excerpt is from Canadian Journalists For Free Expression, it is even more pertinent since it’s CBC that is making these defamatory and libel accusations.)
Jan G commented 2019-10-15 21:18:09 -0400
Hate speech is anything said by a non liberal voter, a non ndp voter and a non green voter.
So who’s left?
or rather, who’s right?
MacVikingg Cumming commented 2019-10-15 20:48:21 -0400
Looks like we mat get a coalition consisting of a terrorist a piss tank and a groper.
Robert McClelland commented 2019-10-15 20:44:37 -0400
Looks like our Drama Queen PM cost us $135,000.00 to stage his latest hoax.
https://buffalochronicle.com/2019/10/15/rcmp-source-says-security-risk-against-trudeau-was-contrived-by-pmo-staffers/
😒😒😒
Dan Mancuso commented 2019-10-15 20:34:34 -0400
As it applies to my God given, unalienable rights and liberties as a Canadian and as a human man…MOLON LABE!
Deborah Graupner commented 2019-10-15 20:05:06 -0400
The only threat for Junior is being exposed as the traitor that he is. The added security is to ensure that the public and real journalists are kept at bay!
Charles White commented 2019-10-15 19:29:34 -0400
Remember when Harper was mocked by the Liberal Party press organs for increasing security over a verified beheading attempt and for the actual attack on parliament.

Now, when Junior stages another fake dramatic play wasting limited security resources, they are all in favour of it.

I noted one comment from a Liberal apologist, John Ivison, that if the threat was not real then the security would not have come out in full battle dress…Junior is P/M, sadly, and can order his security increased.

Finally, every one of the other five leaders are guaranteed to have received similar threats.
Peter Netterville commented 2019-10-15 19:09:17 -0400
Problem with restricting “hate speech” is … who gets to decide what is and what is not hate speech? You? The government?

The CBC and other leftists always cry “The Rebel uses Hate Speech!”

So, CBC and company, define HATE SPEECH precisely and then quote in context written or video proof from The Rebel that which matches your definition of hate speech.

Now, one more thing … prove in inescapable reasoning why your definition of “hate speech” is absolute. Who made you the authority?