Upholding civil liberties: A longform interview with Lawrence Greenspon — Ezra Levant Show

Start your free trial

Access exclusive members only RebelNews+ shows, event footage, and documentaries

Subscribe

• By Tamara Lich

BOOK ON SALE NOW

Tamara Lich, the woman at the heart of the trucker convoy speaks out in her new book "Hold The Line: My Story from the Heart of the Freedom Convoy."

ORDER NOW

Tonight on The Ezra Levant Show, a special longform interview with Tamara Lich's lawyer, Lawrence Greenspon.

As one of Canada's leading civil liberties lawyers, Greenspon's journey through the legal landscape offers a unique perspective on the struggles faced by ordinary citizens against the machinery of authority.

From the onset of his career, Greenspon's expectations were quickly reshaped by the realization that the safeguarding of civil liberties often necessitates legal intervention.

In the tumultuous era marked by lockdowns and pandemic-induced restrictions, Greenspon found himself at the forefront of defending individuals whose lives were disrupted by overbearing regulations.

Central to his narrative is the landmark ruling by the Federal Court of Canada, which deemed the invocation of the Emergencies Act as illegal, unreasonable, and unconstitutional.

Through meticulous legal analysis, the egregious violations of civil liberties and disproportionate measures taken by authorities, were exposed.

Greenspon's involvement in cases such as that of trucker convoy leader Lich epitomizes his commitment to justice. Amidst the legal labyrinth, Greenspon navigates with unwavering resolve, challenging the prosecution's narrative and advocating for the preservation of fundamental freedoms.

The protracted trial of Lich encapsulates the erosion of civil liberties in the face of political expediency. Greenspon's astute observations unveil the systemic failures that permeate the judicial landscape, where justice is often overshadowed by political agendas.

Yet, despite the prevailing darkness, Greenspon remains hopeful. He finds solace in the constitutional mechanisms designed to rectify injustices, placing his trust in the impartiality of the judiciary.