The Alberta Federation of Labour (AFL) released a highly torqued report highlighting alleged harms that Alberta independence would cause to workers. The report was compiled by Jim Stanford, who is best known as an economist formerly employed by the Canadian Autoworkers Union, and the contentions within the report are questionable.

The report’s most glaring sleight of hand is dismissing the claim that Alberta subsidizes the rest of Canada. Fraser Institute work using Statistics Canada fiscal incidence data shows Alberta’s net federal contribution in the range of $18–24 billion in recent years and hundreds of billions cumulatively since the mid-2000s—far larger than any other province. Library of Parliament analysis likewise identified Alberta as the largest per-capita net contributor in 2024. Most economists recognize this mathematical reality.

Go Ad Free

The report warns of lost CPP, EI, OAS, Canada Child Benefit, Charter protections, and federal labour standards. A negotiated split would involve asset division of the CPP (Alberta has long argued its contribution history entitles it to a large share). EI, OAS, and child benefits would be replaced with provincial programs funded by the tax base Alberta currently remits to Ottawa. The transition could be messy, but it‘s not the same as “workers lose everything” as the report claims.

The report delves into the typical narrative of bemoaning corporate profits and the rate at which minimum wages have risen in Alberta. These are contemporary issues that have nothing to do with the independence movement, but the author felt compelled to go into them. That’s because the report is predominantly a manifesto built to critique the provincial government under the guise of a document promoting national unity.

Federal carbon pricing, tanker bans, pipeline delays, Impact Assessment Act uncertainty, and the equalization formula are not imaginary constraints on Alberta’s resource sector. The report treats all of those as secondary and all provincial corporate-tax and labour-policy choices as primary. The almost obsessive focus on provincial policies while departing from the ostensible unity messaging isn’t surprising considering who is behind it.

AFL head Gil McGowan, who commissioned the report, has been heavily involved in the NDP both federally and provincially. He ran failed campaigns for them as a federal candidate and as a contender for the provincial leadership. He compared UCP tactics to those of Nazis and Joseph Goebbels in 2020, and his extreme partisanship drove a firefighters’ local to leave the federation. Anything released by McGowan must be taken with a mountainous grain of salt.

Its conclusions follow from its premises: treat every high-end cost estimate as fact, treat Alberta’s net fiscal contribution as a “myth,” and treat every provincial policy the UCP prefers as the root of worker hardship. That is not how serious fiscal analysis works.