Former Alberta premier Jason Kenney says Albertans should follow the Parti Québécois and put the independence question on ice until Donald Trump is out of the White House.

“Very wise decision by the Parti Quebecois not to hold a secession referendum while Donald Trump is in office,” Kenney wrote, arguing it would be destabilizing to “divide Canadians” while responding to a U.S. president who has threatened to use “economic force” against Canada.

Very wise decision by the Parti Quebecois not to hold a secession referendum while Donald Trump is in office.

They understand how destabilizing it would be to divide Canadians while we are responding to attacks from a President who said he will "use economic force" to "annex… https://t.co/8hYW74uTdT

— Jason Kenney 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇮🇱 (@jkenney) August 18, 2026

Kenney said it was “unfortunate that Alberta hasn't demonstrated the same level of prudence.”

But the comparison between what Quebec has postponed and what Albertans are voting on this October leaves out an important distinction.

The Parti Québécois is talking about delaying an actual referendum on Quebec independence.

PQ Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon announced this week that, should his party form government, a sovereignty referendum would not take place before Trump's term ends in January 2029. He said Trump's unpredictability could interfere with a clear debate over Quebec's future.

Alberta's October 19 vote is not an independence referendum.

Go Ad Free

Question 10 asks Albertans whether Alberta should remain a province of Canada or whether the provincial government should “commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum” on separation. 

In other words, an Option 2 victory would not make Alberta independent. It would not begin separation negotiations with Ottawa or Washington. It would begin the legal process toward another, binding referendum.

Kenney is correct about Trump's January 2025 remarks.

Asked whether he would use military force to acquire Canada, Trump said no, but added: “economic force.” He also described the Canada-U.S. border as an “artificially drawn line.”

There is another way of looking at all of this. 

Supporters of Alberta independence argue the pressures Kenney cites are precisely why Alberta should examine its place in Confederation. From their perspective, pursuing greater autonomy or independence isn't about helping Trump divide Canada. It is an act of political and economic self-defence against decisions made in Ottawa that they believe have repeatedly harmed Alberta's interests.

And unlike the Parti Québécois, Alberta's independence movement isn't willing to give an American president an effective four-year veto over when Albertans are allowed to debate their own constitutional future.

There is also a democratic reality Kenney's criticism overlooks.

The independence issue didn't appear on the October ballot because the Alberta government spontaneously decided this was a convenient moment to talk about separation. A citizen-led independence initiative collected 279,337 valid signatures, well above the 177,732 required by law. Elections Alberta subsequently declared the petition successful. 

Quebec separatists have decided Trump's presidency makes this the wrong time for their next referendum.

Hundreds of thousands of Albertans have demonstrated that they aren't prepared to wait for Washington to decide when they can have the conversation.