The most emotionally effective line in the Forever Canada campaign is also the least accurate. Nobody would lose their CPP entitlements if Alberta were to become independent, but that doesn’t stop Thomas Lukaszuk’s representatives from spreading fear among seniors by perpetuating the myth.

Darlene Rowe, a local organizer for the Forever Canadian unity bus which is touring Alberta as part of Lukaszuk’s referendum campaign, told Town and Country Today, “I did it because I don’t want to lose my CPP and my healthcare. I also want schools and my roads fixed, and if (Alberta) separates, that is all going to go down the toilet."

Go Ad Free

The Canada Pension Plan is a contributory social-insurance scheme. Benefits are earned by premiums paid on employment income. They are already paid to people who leave Canada. If Alberta were to become independent, the pension payments would continue as they are, or Alberta would form a plan with its capital share of the federal plan.

Quebec never joined the CPP. It has run the Quebec Pension Plan since 1966. No one in Quebec “lost” a pension because the province stayed outside the national plan. That single fact should end the slogan that leaving automatically means the cheque stops.

It does say a lot about what federalists think of the Canadian government if they really believe that the pensions of Albertans would be stolen if citizens choose independence.

It all comes down to negotiation. A sudden cutoff of benefits people have already paid for is not how pension systems normally work, and it is not what any serious costing paper on either side actually models. Conflating “the administrator and the asset split would have to be negotiated” with “I lose my CPP” is the scare version, not the legal version.

Old Age Security and the Guaranteed Income Supplement are different. Those are federal programs, not contributory accounts. Rowe did not make that distinction. Most of the fear campaign does not either.

Healthcare delivery is provincial already, and there has been no indication that any Alberta citizens want to depart from a universal coverage model. Whether the net result is better or worse services is a fiscal argument. It is not “healthcare disappears.” Nobody is going to lose healthcare, but it sure offers another nice bogeyman for Campaign Fear to work with.

Likewise, there is no indication that roads would become worse or schools wouldn’t be built. Under most economic modelling, an independent Alberta would have more funds to maintain capital expenses than it would by remaining in the federation.

Forever Canada’s referendum campaign avoids fact and relies on fear. Rowe’s unfounded predictions of a dystopian hellscape in an independent Alberta are par for the course with the group’s referendum campaign messaging. But they have no basis in reality.