Alberta Fact Check: Since when is opposing censorship 'victimhood'?

Albertans have spent decades asking for something remarkably simple: fair treatment within Confederation. Now, when they seek to have a democratic conversation about their future, some seem determined to limit that discussion too.

 

The Canadian Press / Jason Franson

The anti-independence group Vote to Stay is mocking Let Alberta Decide after the pro-referendum campaign said its new Instagram page was mass-reported and automatically removed by Meta.

"This entire campaign is about victimhood," Vote to Stay posted on X. "A victim mindset does not build a country."

That's a remarkable response to a complaint about censorship.

Whether you're for Alberta independence, against it, or undecided, a referendum campaign only works if both sides are free to make their case to voters. If a political organization loses access to a major communications platform because opponents mass report its content, that should concern anyone who claims to support democratic debate.

And if your ideas are strong, you shouldn't need the other side censored to win.

A referendum is supposed to be a contest of ideas. The goal isn't to get your opponents kicked off social media. The goal is to persuade voters.

More than 700,000 Albertans signed one of the two petitions that ultimately led to this referendum. Regardless of which side they support, those Albertans clearly want this conversation to happen.

The irony is that many of the same people who insist Alberta should remain in Canada because democratic institutions matter appear perfectly comfortable when one side of the referendum debate is silenced to limit participation in democracy. 

Albertans have spent decades asking for something remarkably simple: fair treatment within Confederation.

Fair representation. Fair access to markets. Fair treatment for Alberta's largest industries. Fair consideration from governments that rely on Alberta's economic contributions, while often dismissing Alberta's concerns.

Now, when Albertans seek to have a democratic conversation about their future, some seem determined to limit that discussion too.

If a political movement can be mass-reported off social media and its opponents celebrate the outcome rather than condemn it, that only reinforces the frustrations that fuel the independence movement in the first place.

The issue isn't an Instagram page. Albertans must be allowed to speak freely, organize politically, and make their case to their fellow citizens.

If Canada is worth staying in, make that case. If Alberta should remain in Confederation, persuade Albertans.

But don't cheer to censor the debate and then accuse the people being censored of playing the victim.

Albertans deserve a fair vote. Albertans deserve a fair debate. This is not it. 

Help fund our independent reporting on Alberta's independence movement!

Rebel News is stepping up where the legacy media have failed. We've assigned Tamara Lich to follow the Alberta independence movement as it unfolds — not from a government-funded newsroom in Toronto, but on the ground with the people actually shaping it. We don’t take a cent of the Liberals' media bailouts, which means we rely entirely on viewers like you to make this journalism possible. If you want Albertans to have a fair voice in a debate the establishment would rather crush, please chip in today and help us keep this reporting going strong.

Amount
$

Donation frequency

Sheila Gunn Reid

Chief Reporter

Sheila Gunn Reid is the Editor-in-Chief, Alberta Bureau Chief, member of the board of directors, and host of The Gunn Show at Rebel News. Sheila also serves as President of the Independent Press Gallery of Canada. A mother of three and longtime conservative activist, Sheila is the author of bestselling books, including her most recent release, Independence Blueprint: What Alberta Can Learn From Quebec.

https://mybook.to/sheila

COMMENTS

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.