Mark Carney announces he’s going to take another shot at passing Trudeau’s censorship laws

Canada’s identity crisis deepens as censorship plans quietly return.

BECOME A MEMBER

rn-plus

Rebel News +

Our most popular subscription
  • View RebelNews.com without ads
  • Includes 1 free week of RebelNews+
  • Access all RebelNews+ shows
  • Access Comments and RN+ features

$8

Per month CAD

Producers Club

Our top supporters
  • View RebelNews.com without ads
  • Includes 1 free week of RebelNews+
  • Access all RebelNews+ shows
  • Access Comments and RN+ features
  • Invites to producers club only events
  • Special discount at RebelNewsStore.com
  • Free gifts for members, like signed books

$22

Per month CAD


Article by Rebel News staff

The Canada many remember is slipping further out of reach.

A useful symbol of that shift is the ten-dollar bill. The removal of Sir John A. Macdonald was not put to voters, debated in any meaningful national forum, or tested through an election. It simply happened, another quiet but telling signal of a country redefining itself without broad public consent.

That decision reflects a wider cultural trend. Across Canada, historic figures and monuments have been sidelined, boarded up, or torn down altogether. In some cases, this has occurred under governments that claim to stand for conservative values, highlighting how widespread the shift has become.

This raises an important question for provinces like Alberta: what exactly is being preserved by remaining within Confederation? Appeals to unity often rely on nostalgia, a vision of Canada rooted in shared history, sacrifice, and tradition. But that version of the country is increasingly at odds with present realities.

Modern Canada appears to prioritize something very different. Foundational narratives are being replaced, civic traditions abandoned, and ideological frameworks have infected public life. The contrast between past and present is no longer subtle ... it is stark.

That transformation is especially evident in current federal policy discussions. Ottawa is once again aiming to censor online content, marking a third attempt in recent years. The stated goal is to reduce harm, particularly for children and vulnerable groups. On its face, that objective seems to many to be palatable.

However, the proposed approach raises huge concerns. The framework relies on “expert regulators” to define harmful content, enforce standards and ensure compliance. This inevitably leads to a critical question: who determines what constitutes harm?

COMMENTS

Showing 12 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Allen Wild
    commented 2026-04-13 15:39:42 -0400
    Hi Ezra, have you seen the video below? Ultimatum from Washington: Vance Just Collapsed Carney’s Entire Empire
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=739gFSF9Khw
    If it is true, then the question is what will happen if Carney does not play ball?
    Allen Wild, New Westminster, BC
  • Gary Schoutsen
    commented 2026-04-10 10:00:48 -0400
    I think Quebec should separate from Canada.
  • ken wiebe
    commented 2026-04-10 08:09:46 -0400
    I expect that will be easier when Liberals have majority government.
  • Peter Wrenshall
    commented 2026-04-09 23:24:03 -0400
    I’m beginning to wonder: Who would be separating from whom? In many ways Alberta is the last bastion of the Canada that once was, while everywhere else is sinking into some faceless, decaying progressive muck.
  • Gerry Gilchrist
    commented 2026-04-09 22:45:49 -0400
    Was just watching one of my Farm videos from Montana and it was sure nice to see Chris Barber in it doing what he does best trucking.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPoRysHS4ZE
  • Ruth Bard
    commented 2026-04-09 22:08:53 -0400
    A govt that is serious about protecting children would start with the most vulnerable: those not yet born. But it’s still open season on pre-born babies in this country.
  • Clinton Peebles
    commented 2026-04-09 21:51:24 -0400
    I have no doubt that Carney’s Chinese handlers are behind this.
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2026-04-09 21:32:55 -0400
    Thanks for the spoken translation of the French. My vision is very poor so trying to read subtitles is tedious. It puts me off of watching any video with those small words at the bottom of the screen. Thanks for finally using a dubbing service. Please do that more often so blind folks can hear the translation.
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2026-04-09 21:30:47 -0400
    What a cringy video of that NDP loon! How does she know that those missing indigenous women were also LGBT2S etc.? Does she realize that most of the missing women from reserves were victims of indigenous men? People such as her need a brutal fact check.
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2026-04-09 21:27:53 -0400
    I love the idea of having one fewer bureaucratic layer to deal with. Alberta and Quebec have that desire in common. It’s time all independent people band together against Ottawa and their stranglehold on the dominion. It isn’t 1867 anymore.
  • Paul Scofield
    commented 2026-04-09 20:49:48 -0400
    Mr. Pedersen covers most of it! I would add that I have long admired Alexa Lavoie and hoped she would be the Rebel of the Year. She has the most dangerous beat by far and covers the stories with excellent travail. And thanks for the fine interview and dubbed translation. My 8th Grade French class understanding would not have carried the day.
  • Duane Pedersen
    commented 2026-04-09 20:25:34 -0400
    Carney can stick his censorship laws up his ass and the government has no right to remove Canadas history from money or the pass ports They can also cry when Alberta becomes independent and our 15 billion dosent end up for pride Pride has no business to tax payers money and the Liberal’s can take a long walk they have no business useing tax payers dollars like they do without talking about it