Feds blow $25B annually on consultants

Parliamentary scrutiny of annual consultant spending has intensified lately, given the growing public service payroll.

 

Federal managers spending billions on consultants must now sign an oath confirming they have considered the pros and cons of each professional services contract. This comes amidst Parliamentarian complaints of annual consultant spending reaching $25 billion, despite a growing public service payroll.

Treasury Board executive director Emilio Franco testified on May 18 that managers must now sign a pledge before outsourcing work. They must attest that consulting is the correct path and that diligent steps have ensured integrity and proper controls, Franco said.

Cabinet reneged on its 2023 promise to cut consulting spending. New controls were not implemented until earlier this month, according to Blacklock’s.

A June 10 audit revealed federal knowledge of procurement irregularities, possibly breaching the Financial Administration Act. Blacklisted supplier GC Strategies Inc. received over $92.7 million in IT contracts before RCMP raided its offices last year for suspected fraudulent billing.

Auditor General Karen Hogan questioned why IT services are typically procured through staffing companies like GC Strategies. She urged the government to investigate.

“At what point do you believe ministers are accountable for these funds?” asked Conservative MP Stephanie Kusie. “I think it’s ultimately up to this committee and other parliamentarians to hold ministers to account,” replied Auditor Hogan.

“And when we spoke to public servants, some at times were unaware of some of the requirements that existed in the procurement rules,” she told MPs. “I think the rules are clear, in my view.” 

The Department of Public Works has implemented a number of measures that should play a key role in “reducing the size of these contracts,” Franco clarified.

Procurement Ombudsman Alexander Jeglic testified November 26 that federal hiring of consultants and contractors was “near the bottom tier.” 

“The system has not improved during my tenure,” he said at the time, urging drastic changes. Jeglic's remarks came after reviews revealed favouritism in awarding contracts worth $200.4 million since 2015 to one consultant, McKinsey & Company.

“What transpired with McKinsey is a symptom of a broken system and my office has been identifying many of the same issues year after year, report after report,” he said.  “I am very confident in saying it’s time to replace the car.”

Alex Dhaliwal

Journalist and Writer

Alex Dhaliwal is a Political Science graduate from the University of Calgary. He has actively written on relevant Canadian issues with several prominent interviews under his belt.

Help fund Alex's journalism!

COMMENTS

Showing 2 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Bernhard Jatzeck
    commented 2025-06-23 22:15:29 -0400
    Look up how Urban Dictionary defines “consultant”……
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2025-06-23 21:06:21 -0400
    Punish managers who don’t follow rules of their jobs! Why have procedural manuals when nobody follows them?