John Carpay: “Human rights” went from postwar fundamental freedoms to claims against other people

Posted by Ezra Levant on October 01, 2019

On a recent episode of The Ezra Levant Show, John Carpay, a lawyer from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms joined me to talk about various “human rights” complaints he's helping to push back against in Canada including one man who believes he's a victim of discrimination for missing out on babysitting jobs.

James Cyrynowski, a man in his late 20s, has a history of lodging complaints against parents looking for babysitters in Edmonton, Alberta.

Carpay also helped defend the women targeted by Jonathan “Jessica” Yaniv after they refused to provide bikini waxing services.

Do you like this Rebel News story?

Showing 3 reactions

Comment using

Facebook Twitter

Doug McGoldrick commented 2019-10-02 21:39:24 -0400
There is also a couple in the Ottawa area who keep suing Air Canada for anything that is not in French. A few years back they were awarded $12,000. by the Human Rights Commission because they weren’t served a 7-Up in French. By the way the airline serves Sprite, not 7-Up. Fortunately Air Canada appealed and the Court upheld the conviction but made the award zero. Their latest win is just as ridiculous. They won an award because the seat belt buckle only says PULL. It is not in French, but given the average IQ of the French maybe they need instructions on how to open a seat belt.

What this country needs is a ‘Star Chamber’s whereby a group of intelligent people decide who is too much of a pain to live, and then sends out a hit squad. So far we have at least three likely candidates.
Muta Ween commented 2019-10-02 16:24:04 -0400
Urinals are going to be banned in all public washrooms in Portland Oregon because they are deemed offensive to anyone who isn’t a practicing male .I think the cost is around two hundred million.
I’ll just pee on the wall or floor.
Harley McCartney commented 2019-10-02 09:32:36 -0400
This was not what the human rights court was created for, it has been twisted into something most people don,t understand (me included). The legal costs at a minimum are crippling and odd,s seem to be you will be found guilty any way. Another example is the young offenders act. Originally intended so little idiot,s don.t get a criminal record that would follow them around for life. Then the little idiot,s became a useful idiot,s to criminal organizations. Because the get probation and would not do any hard time as an adult would.
The same is true for the faint hope clause for murder,s. The dead dont get any faint hope of coming back.
The excuse is they will be better behaved in prison if they have the possibility of being released. So they committed murder and will behave better next time they are out.
On the mentally ill front too, a multiple murder (occurred in Calgary) has now been released on un-escorted day passes. I have absolutely no trust in our legal system. Especially when they can escape mental (hospitals/prison) get on an airplane flight an international one and leave the country.