CAF vaccine mandate lawsuit dismissed — plaintiffs say fight isn’t over

After the federal court loss, counsel and plaintiff join Rebel News to discuss what comes next in their Canadian Armed Forces vaccine mandate fight.

On November 13, the Federal Court dealt a significant blow to media freedom and bodily autonomy by dismissing the case of over 330 present and former members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) who allege that their superiors abused their power, authority, and infringed upon their rights when implementing a cohesive COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Alberta-based Justice Catherine A. Coughlan, who sided with the Government of Canada’s motion to strike, criticized the case as being "vexatious," failing to "plead material facts," and containing assertions that "constitute abuse of process."

The judge also labeled the plaintiffs' description of COVID-19 jabs as "experimental gene therapy" as an example of the “inflammatory” language throughout the pleadings.

The case has been dismissed without allowance to amend, and leaves the plaintiffs collectively on the hook for $5,040 in costs to be paid jointly.

In today's report, counsel for the plaintiffs, Christine Christiansen with Valour Law, and James Formosa, one of the 330 plaintiffs she represents, join Rebel News to discuss the judge’s reasoning and inform the public that an appeal is likely on the way.

PETITION: No More Shots!

46,873 signatures
Goal: 50,000 signatures

Please sign our petition to demand that Canada’s Minister of Health, Mark Holland, take the mRNA COVID-19 shots off of the market immediately, following the revelation that Health Canada has confirmed the presence of at least one previously undisclosed plasmid, a residual DNA sequence.

Will you sign?

Donate to Rebel News

Unlike almost all of our mainstream media competitors, Rebel News doesn’t receive any government funding. We rely on our generous audience to help keep us reporting.

Drea Humphrey

B.C. Bureau Chief

Based in British Columbia, Drea Humphrey reports on Western Canada for Rebel News. Drea’s reporting is not afraid to challenge political correctness, or ask the tough questions that mainstream media tends to avoid.

COMMENTS

Showing 1 Comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • DeWitt Shainline
    commented 2024-11-24 20:22:24 -0500
    God Bless Catherine Christensen. I’m one of the posties that the same judge ruled against, and it’s true — the grievance process in our case did not even address the issue, but instead was a charade intended to give the excuse that nothing could be done. The courts must be made to address these travesties, the judges held accountable — not just in c-19 cases, but all these cases where the criminals skate and the victims are left without justice.