Parks Canada knew—then let Jasper burn

They left half a million acres of dead trees standing, then blamed climate change when it all went up in smoke.

 

The Canadian Press / Amber Bracken

Blacklock’s Reporter broke a bombshell story, and it’s exactly the kind of government negligence Canadians need to hear about—because it’s being buried under a pile of political spin and climate talking points.

Access To Information documents reveal that Parks Canada left more than 577,000 acres of beetle-killed pine standing in Jasper National Park, fully aware it posed a catastrophic wildfire risk. And what did they do about it? Practically nothing.

In the entire year before the July 24, 2023 wildfire that destroyed 358 buildings and caused $1.2 billion in damages, Parks Canada conducted zero prescribed burns in Mountain Pine Beetle zones. In fact, over four years, they only removed 1,529 acres of deadwood—less than 0.3% of the known hazard.

Yet when the inevitable happened, the federal government didn’t point fingers at poor forest management. No, they dusted off their tired excuse: climate change.

Then-environment minister Steven Guilbeault said the fire was “one demonstration of the impact of climate change.” Then-emergency preparedness minister Harjit Sajjan solemnly declared Jasper a “victim.” Not of neglect or inaction. Of global warming.

But internal emails, released thanks to Conservative MP Dan Mazier, paint a damning picture. In one February 2024 message, Parks Canada staff actually discussed cancelling controlled burns—not because it was unsafe, but because “public and political perception may become more important than actual prescription windows.”

Translation? They were more worried about media optics than protecting the public.

And this wasn’t some unforeseen crisis. Back in 2020, Parks Canada’s own VP Darlene Upton testified before the House environment committee, saying, “Obviously one of the big concerns is the dead trees and the fuel load.”

They knew. They sat on their hands. And when it all burned, they ran to the podium to push a narrative instead of taking accountability.

This is what happens when you manage forests with politics instead of science.

And if this is what “one of the most fire-prepared communities in Canada” looks like—God help the rest of us.

Donate to Rebel News

Unlike almost all of our mainstream media competitors, Rebel News doesn’t receive any government funding. We rely on our generous audience to help keep us reporting.

Sheila Gunn Reid

Chief Reporter

Sheila Gunn Reid is the Alberta Bureau Chief for Rebel News and host of the weekly The Gunn Show with Sheila Gunn Reid. She's a mother of three, conservative activist, and the author of best-selling books including Stop Notley.

COMMENTS

Showing 3 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Fran g
    commented 2025-05-11 13:57:28 -0400
    So many reasons why this was on purpose. Reinforce the agenda of “climate change”, deposits of Lithium for EVs , keeping the environmentalist minions happy, and just creating division.
  • Bernhard Jatzeck
    commented 2025-05-08 22:01:07 -0400
    I’m reminded of what happened in the Fort McMurray in 2016. The fire-fighting company took its planes elsewhere because it didn’t have a contract and, soon afterward, the city burned. Coincidence?
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2025-05-08 20:06:11 -0400
    Stupid bureaucrats missed a golden opportunity to cash in on all that lumber. It could be sold to businesses for firewood. And if people asked why the trees were being cut down, fire prevention would silence them. But it’s easy to do nothing and then blame others afterwards.