Sheila Gunn Reid: Why partner with the people who killed the last pipelines?
'At least the private sector company has shareholders to be accountable for,' said Sheila. 'If the feds decide along the way to change the rules, and all of a sudden the pipeline doesn't go forward, what do they care?'
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is defending the province's decision to take an equity stake in a new pipeline project, arguing the private sector has been burned too many times by federal regulatory reversals to go it alone.
Asked why the project now requires government support, Smith pointed to a string of cancelled pipelines, including Northern Gateway, Keystone XL and Energy East, which she said companies had already sunk billions into before the projects collapsed.
Smith added that the federal government, Alberta, and British Columbia have made a "real commitment" to see the project through, and noted Ottawa has already collected more than a billion dollars in dividends from the Trans Mountain pipeline, calling the infrastructure "an incredibly lucrative type of infrastructure that will benefit taxpayers."
On Friday's Rebel Roundtable livestream, Sheila Gunn Reid and Drea Humphrey were joined by Ezra Levant to react to Smith's comments, questioning why Alberta would partner with the very governments responsible for killing past pipeline projects.
Sheila noted the irony of Smith listing off federally cancelled pipelines only to team up with Ottawa on the next one.
"Who's to say they aren't going to change the rules on their own project?" she asked. "At least the private sector company has shareholders to be accountable for. If the feds decide along the way to change the rules, and all of a sudden the pipeline doesn't go forward, what do they care?"
Ezra said the real test of the project's viability will be whether private companies choose to participate, pointing to South Bow — a separate, fully subscribed pipeline — as a sign of what genuine investor confidence looks like. He also raised concerns about Venezuela's growing oil production potentially undercutting Canada's opportunity in the heavy oil market.
"We might miss our moment," he said. "I just find this very sad as someone who grew up in Alberta. I always thought that industry was relentless, indefatigable, unlimited, and now I just see it's like Gulliver in Gulliver's Travels; it's being tied down by a 1000 little people with strings."
Ezra went on to criticize Smith for stepping back from talk of Alberta independence as a bargaining tool, replaying a years-old clip of Smith discussing the idea of an "or else" to pressure Ottawa, and suggesting she has since abandoned that leverage.
"To give away the 'or else' of independence while you're trying to negotiate something, I just don't get it," he said. "Makes me a little bit sad to look at that old clip there, because that's a fighting spirit."
Livestream Clips
Catch the most impactful clips from our daily news livestream, Rebel Roundup, featuring breaking stories, bold opinions, and exclusive insights from our top reporters. Stay informed and never miss a moment—watch now!
https://www.rebelnews.com/live
COMMENTS
-
Fran g commented 2026-07-06 19:19:09 -0400Lynne it sounds like you know more than I do about the process, but what do you mean by good news.? I guess you were being sarcastic. I agree with everything you said and also this bloody Pathways that carnage has huge money in that he will once again profit heavily while all Canadians are screwed, nothing new here. IF this goes through, and I hope it falls flat soon, because of the stupidity of carbon capture the oil will be much higher priced and no other country will pay for our artificially high price, why would they? With this going on and islamic prayers being belted out in Sask and also carnages and ebys bailout for Toronto and Vancouver condo kings, how in the world do the large number of stupid people in the east not get a clue? -
Bernhard Jatzeck commented 2026-07-05 23:14:17 -0400Remember what happened with the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline? Ottawa made sympathetic noises, an inquiry was established under the guidance of Tom Berger, and, after several years of sound, fury, smoke, and mirrors, the project was “postponed”.
Sound familiar? -
Lynne Osborne commented 2026-07-05 11:01:08 -0400The good news. The new project will not need to go through the Open Season process as it can be built without any timelines, cost controls or even a committed client base to use it. If a competitive line should be contemplated that offers the same service for far less, Ottawa can simply outlaw it. Reasons: Trump, climate change, whatever. Only the interest needs to be paid on the debt piled high to build this thing. Once all the pipelines are in the same right of way run by the same people Ottawa can bleed away profits and unions, First Nations, whomever can hold the country hostage anytime they wish. Eby will get paid for a natural risk that really doesn’t exist. The risks will be all polticial. One box of dynamite will cost Canada hundreds of millions a day. Since billions in private oil production investment will be needed to fill this thing one has to wonder? First Nations will of course be consulted. But, what about national security and the military? Anyone talk to the military? -
Matthew Beatty commented 2026-07-05 08:13:42 -0400This deal is a sell out, for optics. -
J.G. Smith commented 2026-07-04 23:14:33 -0400Am I missing something? What good is a pipeline to the coast if the tankers required to carry the oil are banned?