Alberta boots graphic smut from school libraries—media cries 'book banning'
This isn't censorship. It's protection. It's sanity. It's Alberta saying: Not our kids. Not anymore.
It's not censorship to keep dick-wagging, gender-wang books out of the hands of little kids.
And if you disagree, honestly, your hard drive—and your head—need a full forensic scan.
Alberta's government just took the most reasonable step imaginable: keeping graphic sexual content—some of it too obscene to show adults at a press conference—out of school libraries meant for children.
These books are too graphic to show you in this video, but I will include a link to the Alberta government Dropbox so you can see them for yourself.
And the response to that smart move to keep smut away from little ones? Media meltdown. NDP hysteria. Establishment freakout.
Let's run the highlight reel:
-
Alberta media had access to that same government Dropbox full of these explicit book excerpts before the press conference. They saw the strap-ons, blowjob sexts, group cum dares—the whole parade of degeneracy… and still called it "book banning." Absolute weirdos.
-
A former cabinet minister in Alberta, Thomas Lukaszuk, asked where the "book burning" event would be—because, apparently, saying "maybe 5-year-olds shouldn't read about sex toys" now makes you Hitler.
-
A Sportsnet journalist, Mark Spector—yes, really—chimed in with, "Who asked for this?" Mark, buddy, parents asked. You know, the people whose kids are being handed cartoon porn by government-paid librarians.
-
And the cherry on top? An Alberta NDP MLA, Lori Sigurdson, rushed to condemn the move, defending, let's be clear here, keeping graphic pornography available to elementary-age students.
That's the hill they want to die on: "Let the little kids have the porn."
Let me be absolutely clear: This isn't about banning books. It's about banning garbage.
It's about saying: "No, Grade 3 kids don't need to read about strap-ons and oral sex during library time."
If it's too graphic for the 6 o'clock news, it's too graphic for a six-year-old.
The freaks defending this filth are so far removed from normal people, they might as well be speaking Martian. Normal people—parents—don't want their kids reading "vagina slime" erotica at school.
This isn't censorship. It's protection. It's sanity. It's Alberta saying: Not our kids. Not anymore.
Not today, Satan.

Sheila Gunn Reid
Chief Reporter
Sheila Gunn Reid is the Alberta Bureau Chief for Rebel News and host of the weekly The Gunn Show with Sheila Gunn Reid. She's a mother of three, conservative activist, and the author of best-selling books including Stop Notley.

COMMENTS
-
Fran g commented 2025-06-01 18:38:30 -0400I cant believe how far we have fallen into hedonism. That is how many civilizations in the past have fell ei Rome. Common Sense please come back!
-
Brandy Zavisha commented 2025-05-30 13:13:04 -0400The only people outraged about the banning are pedos. Some of that material was clearly child sexual abuse. Do they even have children or do they just want to indoctrinate to abuse ours?
-
Frank Narejko commented 2025-05-30 11:14:05 -0400Okay Pervs. Pick your hill to die on.
-
Robert Pariseau commented 2025-05-29 19:49:08 -0400And what if they were conservative publications?
-
Robert Pariseau commented 2025-05-29 19:47:32 -0400Drag queen storytime is over.
-
Robin Dutton commented 2025-05-27 22:47:12 -0400Yes indeed Mr Jatzeck. I loved the books you mentioned plus Asimov, Bradbury, Heinlein, Melville and T E Lawrence. Even Ann Rand , Orwell and Tolstoy. A nasty lot they were, colonizers and exploiters. Bad, bad education I had.
In the smut department, there was the Sears Catalog. Racy publication that was. -
Bernhard Jatzeck commented 2025-05-27 20:13:11 -0400I didn’t read any smut while I was in high school, Instead, I read a lot of science fiction, including books by Arthur C. Clarke and Jules Verne. According to those lefties, my education was inadequate.
-
Bruce Atchison commented 2025-05-27 19:35:48 -0400What hypocrites leftists are. Children belong to parents, not perverts.