Carney using kids' safety as cover to strip Canadians' freedom
The Liberal government is set to introduce a bill banning social media for users under 16 — but Ezra Levant says the real purpose is forcing every Canadian to identify themselves to access the internet.
The Liberal government is preparing to introduce a new digital safety bill that would ban social media for users under 16, but on Tuesday's episode of The Ezra Levant Show, Ezra said this new legislation has nothing to do with protecting children.
“Parents can limit what their kids watch with the push of a button,” he said. “This is really about everyone else. Again, using kids as the excuse.”
The bill, reported by the Globe and Mail ahead of its introduction, would create a new digital regulator to establish safety standards for social media platforms. It would also address artificial intelligence and chatbots.
But the mechanism required to enforce an under-16 ban, Ezra noted, is the problem. To determine who is under 16, every user would need to verify their age — meaning every Canadian would need to hand their personal identification to the government just to log on.
“Mark Carney wants to make everyone sign into the internet,” he said. “It's not actually about kids, is it?”
Ezra drew a direct line to the Liberals' past censorship efforts, noting that child protection and anti-terrorism provisions have repeatedly been used as packaging for speech regulation bills — provisions that already exist in the Criminal Code, added as a distraction from the bills' real purpose.
“Governments use children as a cover for their plots,” he reminded viewers.
The timing raised eyebrows, as the day before Canada's announcement, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer delivered an almost identical speech calling on tech companies to introduce device controls to prevent children from sending and receiving explicit images.
Ezra said the parallel is not a coincidence. “On everything from censorship and digital ID to environmentalism and mass immigration, I really think Keir Starmer is setting a lot of Canadian policy,” he said.
The irony, he noted, is that Starmer has refused to call a meaningful public inquiry into the U.K.'s rape gangs and even vigorously opposed one when he was the country's chief prosecutor.
“What a laugh to pretend he cares about kids,” Ezra said.
Another provision in the bill would grant the Canadian government a security backdoor into any app it chooses. Ezra also pointed out that every major social media platform in Canada is American owned, meaning new fines and restrictions would amount to a tax on U.S. tech firms.
“You think that's going to go down well in our trade negotiations with Trump?” he wondered.
In a strange twist, Ezra concluded that the most effective force defending civil liberties in Canada and the United Kingdom is not either country's Parliament or judicial system, and certainly not their media outlets.
Rather, it's the United States, which under President Donald Trump's leadership, is pushing back against foreign censorship to protect American platforms.
“I hope someone in Canada one day cares enough to stand up to all this censorship when Donald Trump is gone,” he said. “But I'm not sure if I see it.”
RebelNews+ Clips
RebelNews+ is our premium subscription service, which gives you access to our exclusive long form, TV-style shows, documentaries, members-only comments section, and the ability to read RebelNews.com without ads.
Subscribe now to get the full experience!
https://rebelnewsplus.com/