Could the Keystone XL pipeline save Canada?
Keystone XL is an opportunity to strengthen Canada's economy, create jobs and improve U.S. relations. So why isn't it on the table?
Â
BECOME A MEMBER
Tonight, on The Ezra Levant Show, when Donald Trump recently floated the idea of reviving the Keystone XL pipeline, it barely made headlines. But why not? This single project could add 1% to Canada’s GDP, create jobs, and strengthen economic ties with the U.S.
Trump’s tariff talk has rattled Canada, but his main economic grievance — our trade surplus — is largely tied to oil. Keystone XL would be a logical solution, sending Canadian oil south while reducing U.S. dependence on OPEC. Yet, instead of seizing this opportunity, Canada’s political establishment remains fixated on symbolic opposition to Trump, even as leaders like Mark Carney back anti-oil policies like Bill C-69.
At a recent Pierre Poilievre press conference, Rebel News was once again shut out of questions. Mainstream journalists were granted access, while those willing to challenge the narrative were sidelined. One key question remains unasked: Would Poilievre push for a Keystone XL revival?
Israel recently removed all tariffs on U.S. goods — a move lauded by free-market economists like Milton Friedman. Meanwhile, Canada clings to protectionist policies that make consumers pay more. Trump, ever the negotiator, uses tariffs as leverage, aiming for reciprocal free trade. Canada should counter with a proactive proposal: Keystone XL.
The Conservatives talk about economic growth, but dodging tough questions isn’t leadership. If Poilievre truly wants to stand up for Canadian workers, he should champion Keystone XL — before the opportunity is lost again.
GUEST: China Affairs political commentator Terence Shen on Mark Carney's decision to back disgraced Liberal candidate Paul Chiang over his call to kidnap a Conservative rival.
COMMENTS
-
Dale Bisanti commented 2025-04-06 16:54:06 -0400Appreciate your excellent research and reporting! Thank you! -
Don Armitage commented 2025-04-04 16:28:56 -0400It’s possible that the CPC are shutting you out because you gave Max Bernier a platform. I’m glad you did. He and Danielle Smith are the most sensible politicians in Canada. The CPC does have many good policies. However they are pretty wobbly on a few significant issues. For example they would maintain the present equalization program and formula, maintain the supply management system,and continue adherence to the Paris Climate Accord. They only found their backbones on the lockdown, mask and vaccine mandates after the Freedom Convoy came to Ottawa. They do not have any concrete ideas on how to change the Canadian constitution to make it fair for western Canada.
-
Robert Stone commented 2025-04-03 18:15:00 -0400This does not take into consideration capital investment. This is globalism, where capital is under the control of a few, and they will invest there money where labour is cheap. Such as China. After Mulroney brought in free trade, and the Americans bought up Canadian manufacturing then they moved it to the US.
-
Gary Schoutsen commented 2025-04-03 16:00:41 -0400Milton Freedman is wrong. Citizens are not better off if good paying jobs move away.
-
Lillian Kelly commented 2025-04-03 00:19:38 -0400Yes …ask Poilievre the question about Keystone.
-
Paul McCullough commented 2025-04-02 23:09:31 -0400I keep asking people what, specifically, is unreasonable about what Trump is demanding. I haven’t gotten any actual answers, just emotional responses or nothing.
-
Naida Traviza commented 2025-04-02 21:09:05 -0400I don’t believe Paul Chiang was joking either and is still loyal to the Chinese Communist party. The laughter coming from those people was disturbing.
-
Bruce Atchison commented 2025-04-02 21:02:22 -0400Pierre Poilievre’s people are too cautious. They don’t want to jinx their lead in the polls. I wish Pierre would let all media in instead of being exclusivist like Carney and his team are.
-
Bernhard Jatzeck commented 2025-04-02 20:27:23 -0400It might as it gives Canada a ready market for its oil.
