It’s true: Mark Carney is trying to put together an anti-American world coalition
Mark Carney’s latest international maneuvers reveal a dramatic shift that risks Canada’s long-standing alliance with the United States.
BECOME A MEMBER
Article by Rebel News staff
It’s becoming impossible to ignore: Mark Carney is orchestrating a global anti-American coalition. From Davos to China, his diplomatic moves suggest he’s invested in aligning smaller nations, and even powerful economic blocs, against the U.S., while cozying up to Beijing and other players.
Meanwhile, tensions in the Middle East are escalating. With aircraft carriers being deployed and Israeli alerts rising, a war with Iran seems increasingly imminent. Unlike Venezuela, which the U.S. handled with relative ease, Iran is larger, wealthier and its networks of influence stretch from Lebanon to Syria to Hamas and Hezbollah. This isn’t a small test of military might, it’s a high-stakes showdown. And Israel will likely share the burden.
Trump’s approach over the past decade has been clear: counter Iran and China, build coalitions with reliable partners. The U.S., Israel, the UK, and Gulf states are aligned, while Canada, under Carney’s guidance, seems sidelined. Carney’s efforts to form a 12-nation Indo-Pacific economic bloc alongside the EU mirror past initiatives where he’s leveraged personal connections with world leaders — moves that appear more about influence than national interest.
Carney’s anti-American rhetoric contrasts sharply with American lawmakers like Marco Rubio, whose recent Munich speech celebrated Western civilization, shared heritage and historical Christian roots. Rubio’s address was well-received, forward-looking and rooted in facts. Carney’s critiques, by contrast, lean toward theatrics and political point-scoring, rather than fostering practical alliances.
This raises a larger question: does Carney truly understand Canada’s history and values? From the constitutional acknowledgment of Christianity to centuries of shared heritage with the U.S. and Europe, Canada’s foundation is intertwined with the West. Yet Carney seems determined to portray the country as post-Christian, overly diverse in a way that discounts its history, and anti-American in its policies.
For Canadians, this isn’t merely about politics. It’s about strategic alignment, national interest and regional stability. Carney may gain influence among global elites, but at what cost? If Canada continues down this path, it risks weakening alliances, inflaming domestic tensions and adding fuel to movements like Alberta independence. Carney’s ambitions may serve his personal agenda, but they do not serve Canada.
GUEST: Jon, an Alberta patriot on his street activism and how the independence movement is resonating with regular citizens.
COMMENTS
-
Melvyn Schobel commented 2026-02-20 07:18:15 -0500Carney loves hobnobbing with the upper class, the elitists who share his ambition for control. Being recognized and held in high esteem is important to his false ego. To have him as our leader in Canada guarantees our failure to survive in this hectic world. He does not have Canada’s best interest at heart as he jets across the world at our expense. To dive deeper into his strategy, you must ask the question, “What action has he taken that has enriched our lives?” If it’s taken you this long to secure an answer, better order another round as you contemplate your thoughtful response.
-
Paul Scofield commented 2026-02-19 20:03:10 -0500Yes and no, Mr. Schoutsen. The LPC was shrewd enough to pivot on Trump’s comments, since they were losing badly to Poilievre. That said, Mr. Poilievre faded considerably in the stretch because of, among other things, not hammering home the real problems with the Third World overrunning Canada. Poilievre was so afraid of being labelled Trump-lite he let go of some important to Canadians issues.
The LPC was also able to gin up unreasonable fear of eastern Canada against the American colossus. That certain Canadian voters were so easily bamboozled can’t be completely laid at the feet of President Trump. Like their American counterparts, the Canadian Left could not run on their record and be elected. So they created a foreign boogey-man and ran against him. Do I wish Trump would have said 51st state less often? Of course. But to suggest that he was to sole cause of the Carney election seems a bit much. -
Gary Schoutsen commented 2026-02-19 15:07:31 -0500We can thank Donald Trump for Mark Carney. Poilievre was well on his way to be PM until Trump’s 51st state comments. People can mock Canadians for the way they reacted but it happened none the less.
-
Peter Wrenshall commented 2026-02-18 22:58:22 -0500Having watched Marco Rubio’s speech in its entirety earlier, I start to get the feeling that he is cut from Ronald Reagan timber.
-
Michael Guillery commented 2026-02-18 22:08:30 -0500Is Carney implying Canada should seek ‘partners’ who would have tampons in their men’s washrooms? -
Susan Ashbrook commented 2026-02-18 22:03:05 -0500I don’t know what Mark Carney’s plans are, or who he serves, but I know for a fact that it is not me or other ordinary Canadians.
As for bureaucracy, the larger it gets the less bureaucrats actually have to do and therefore the less efficient it becomes. -
mark gaboury commented 2026-02-18 20:56:18 -0500I really enjoyed laughing with you guys about the exposure, and at the expense, of the CRA and its incompetence. I will watch that part again when I need a good laugh. Bad government means a lot of things, but always at least this: the more you pay for, the less you get, and the product that you do get is always worse.
-
Jane Vandervliet commented 2026-02-18 20:30:22 -0500So Carney’s wealth is in the USA held in Brookfield but he hates America? Make it make sense. Perhaps it is Canada he hates.
