Budget 2026 targets faster land seizures for Alto high-speed rail

Ottawa proposes further expropriation changes for a railway without a final route, as farmers warn of unfair seizure, divided fields, dwindling property value, and threatened livelihoods.

Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne titled Budget 2026 Masters of Our Destiny, but try telling that to farmers watching the Liberals make it easier to take their land for a train that has not broken ground.

In Annex 3, under “Accelerating High-Speed Rail Construction,” the government proposes legislation to streamline expropriation and enable early pre-construction work for Alto, the planned Toronto–Quebec City high-speed railway.

There is no draft bill accompanying that entry, and no explanation of which property-owner protections could change.

This is not Ottawa’s first pass. The High Speed Rail Network Act, passed in March 2026, already allows the Crown corporation to seek expropriation without first demonstrating an attempt to purchase the land. It also removed the usual public hearings on objections. Landowners can still object in writing, but no longer have that public forum to make their case.

Now the Liberals want another round of streamlining.

Alto’s CEO argued before a parliamentary committee in February that clearer legislative tools were necessary to prevent delays, limit speculation and manage financial risk. He also acknowledged that expropriation is deeply sensitive and said voluntary agreements would remain the preferred approach.

For affected farmers, those assurances sit alongside enormous uncertainty over when voluntary negotiations will give way to forced expropriation.

Alto describes a roughly 1,000-kilometre network linking Toronto, Peterborough, Ottawa, Montreal, Laval, Trois-Rivières and Quebec City. Its working construction estimate is $60 billion to $90 billion. The Parliamentary Budget Officer puts the figure higher, at roughly $75 billion to $113 billion.

The final alignment is still not set, with Alto saying it’s narrowing a study corridor. The spending, however, has already been well underway.

Ottawa committed $3.9 billion over six years for co-development when it selected the Cadence Consortium in February 2025. The partnership includes AtkinsRéalis, which is just SNC-Lavalin rebranded, a company with a history of corruption and corporate misconduct now entrusted with delivering one of Canada's largest infrastructure projects.

Alto’s 2024–25 annual report records nearly $77 million in expenses, including $48.5 million for professional services and $22.8 million for compensation and benefits.

A parliamentary response also disclosed $2.76 million in short-term incentive payments covering part of 2025. All 134 officials received a payment, with 18 executive-level officials sharing approximately $1.2 million.

Meanwhile, the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, Ontario Landowners Association and Quebec farm groups have warned that the railway will divide land farmers have held for generations, destroy ecologically sensitive areas, sever access and jeopardize livelihoods.

Even after billions have been committed and millions made in incentives, there’s no final route, but just the ever-increasing promise that the government is accelerating the acquisition of private land.

Before the Liberals claim Canadians are masters of their destiny, landowners deserve to see exactly what powers it intends to claim over theirs.

Sign the petition to stop the Alto rail line!

11,513 signatures
Goal: 15,000 signatures

Ottawa is advancing ALTO — a proposed 300 km/h rail line from Toronto to Quebec City — with a projected cost of $90 billion and no guarantee that'll be the end of it.

The plan would carve a 1,000-kilometre corridor up to 60 metres wide through productive farmland and private property, dividing communities and affecting families who receive little to no benefit. In many stretches, there are no rural stations planned at all.

Other megaprojects have spiralled in cost and delay. Meanwhile, consultations are closing quickly, and concerns remain about expropriation, oversight, and accountability.

Before billions more are committed and land is permanently disrupted, Canadians deserve transparency and a full public debate.

Will you sign?

Tamara Ugolini

Senior Editor

Tamara Ugolini is an informed choice advocate turned journalist whose journey into motherhood sparked her passion for parental rights and the importance of true informed consent. She critically examines the shortcomings of "Big Policy" and its impact on individuals, while challenging mainstream narratives to empower others in their decision-making.

COMMENTS

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.