Conservatives say any digital ID mandate must be ‘voluntary’

MP Leslyn Lewis denounced the measure, saying that a “trusted artificial intelligence ecosystem becomes a polite euphemism for centralized control.”

 

Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis demanded that digital ID programs must be strictly voluntary, as the Department of Employment moves to enable digital ID for employment insurance and old age security applications.

“Every promise of transparency can become a tool of surveillance if not guided by the principles of freedom that we cherish,” Lewis said yesterday in the Commons. “If everything of value becomes data, every aspect of our lives can become data to be recorded and monetized. That is why we must be on guard.”

MP Lewis stressed yesterday that taxpayers require safeguards, asserting, “Digital infrastructure is not neutral.” She stated they “deserve to know where data are stored, who profits from its use and whether freely opting out” of systems like digital ID remains a right for accessing essential public services. She concluded that without these answers, a “trusted artificial intelligence ecosystem becomes a polite euphemism for centralized control.”

“We must never allow people to be reduced to mere consumers at the end of a bar code,” Lewis told MPs. “Human beings are not data points to be managed,” she said. “We are souls with a purpose. The future we build must reflect that truth.”

A November 4 cabinet budget note announced an amendment to the Department of Employment and Social Development Act to permit “information sharing and digital services” for benefits claimants, though no legal text was provided, as reported by Blacklock’s.

The employment department states digital ID will be a voluntary convenience, not replacing existing in-person, mail, or phone services, according to a May 20 briefing note, A Single Sign-In Portal For Government Services. It emphasized building strong privacy and security features for “convenience and confidence.”

A May 20 memo, Digital Credentials Issue, admitted the complexity of a digital ID system. The department noted, “Building this kind of system is complex and requires certain specialized tools and expertise we don’t have in-house,” and is “asking industry to help” based on international best practices.

“We are moving to [the] next steps to our engagement of external contractors,” said the memo. “This solution will give departments the ability to issue digital versions of the physical credentials they already provide today.”

This follows an October 2024 cabinet notice suggesting an optional digital ID, despite public skepticism. The plan aims to offer “fast and efficient delivery of government services” for programs like pensions, EI, and tax filing.

Recent federal records show the Liberal government under Justin Trudeau quietly spent $6.4 million on digital ID programs that fell through, according to Blacklock’s.

Federal regulators announced plans for digital credentials on October 28, 2024, without parliamentary approval, raising MP concerns over cost and security. However, cabinet clarified in a parliamentary response that there are “no plans to consider or introduce a federally issued digital ID.”

Please sign the petition to Stop Digital ID!

45,337 signatures
Goal: 50,000 signatures

Governments across the world are trying to implement digital ID. New systems will grant access to all of your personal information, even including the ability to monitor your whereabouts. They must be stopped.

Will you sign?

Alex Dhaliwal

Journalist and Writer

Alex Dhaliwal is a Political Science graduate from the University of Calgary. He has actively written on relevant Canadian issues with several prominent interviews under his belt.

Help fund Alex's journalism!

COMMENTS

Showing 3 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Fran G
    commented 2025-11-19 19:10:55 -0500
    All of our federal voting has been corrupted for decades, certainly the last 10.
  • Bernhard Jatzeck
    commented 2025-11-18 20:56:52 -0500
    This will, of course, mean the end of anonymous voting.
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2025-11-18 19:47:06 -0500
    This is exactly why Liberalism is so evil. It turns people with lives and experiences into manageable units. We don’t want a Chinese-style social credit system where the government can cut our electricity, water, and gas because of a socialist media post.