Feds can block ‘nation-building’ projects if conditions not met, says cabinet minister

Opposition groups fear the rushed-through Parliament bill will grant cabinet excessive power to approve favoured industrial projects, overriding other laws.

 

The Canadian Press / Adrian Wyld

Controversial Liberal legislation that would allow cabinet to quickly approve major industrial projects, passed committee early Thursday, according to the Canadian Press.

On June 17, Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc told senators that Bill C-5, An Act To Enact The Free Trade And Labour Mobility In Canada Act, aims to accelerate federal approvals for nationally significant projects, eliminating traditional delays to serve the national interest.

“Every day of the election campaign, the prime minister spoke about building big projects in the national interest ... So none of this should surprise Canadians,” LeBlanc said. “There is a great, great deal of enthusiasm from all first ministers,” he added.

However, opposition groups fear the bill, rushed through Parliament, grants cabinet excessive power to approve favoured industrial projects, overriding other laws. 

Senator Leo Housakos criticized the bill, stating it grants a single minister unprecedented power to fast-track projects deemed "of national interest" or delay those refused designation, potentially due to ideological reasons. 

LeBlanc disagreed, stating “this bill strikes the right balance.” He earlier claimed that conventional oil pipelines may not be included in future talks.

The Minister clarified that cabinet would seek “consensus” on which projects would be fast-tracked. He did not elaborate, according to Blacklock’s. 

LeBlanc informed the Senate that fast-tracking of industrial projects shouldn't strictly define cabinet, asserting the Liberal government presented a "compelling case to Canadians" for its necessity, given the U.S. trade war.

Businesses and building trades support the legislation, citing that project approval often takes longer than construction. C-5, in its current form, would allow first ministers to backload assessments considering "any factor" (Section 5.6).

Senator Paula Simons argues Bill C-5 may bypass environmental assessments, though LeBlanc insists assessments are key and non-compliant projects may lack approval.

Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, the only Liberal dissenter, worries that limited testimony time restricts democratic input, while others suggest amendments can come later.

Bill C-5 merges two laws: removing internal trade barriers by Canada Day and fast-tracking "national interest" projects, likely passing the Commons with Conservative support. MP Philip Lawrence calls it a modest step in the right direction, that "barely scratches the surface."

Senators criticize the bill's vague "national interest" definition and rushed process, claiming it limits parliamentary debate.

The House of Commons reviewed Bill C-5 from Wednesday afternoon to after midnight, as the Liberal government aims to pass it this week. The Senate plans to complete its review by June 27, though Senator Wallin noted, “This is not our general procedure."

"We would usually send a bill to committee, we would have witnesses, we would take testimony, and we would apply a sober second thought to that bill,” she added.

Please help Rebel News expose the truth about Mark Carney!

Mark Carney has spent years quietly shaping Canada’s most damaging policies from behind the scenes, all while profiting from offshore tax schemes, cozy financial ties with China, and connections to convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell. Canadians deserve to know the full truth about his record of hypocrisy and elitist control. Only Rebel News has the guts to stand up to and confront the most powerful man in Canada. Please donate here to help us expose Mark Carney’s globalist agenda and defend the future of our country!

Amount
$

Alex Dhaliwal

Journalist and Writer

Alex Dhaliwal is a Political Science graduate from the University of Calgary. He has actively written on relevant Canadian issues with several prominent interviews under his belt.

Help fund Alex's journalism!

COMMENTS

Showing 3 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Fran g
    commented 2025-07-07 18:58:48 -0400
    The devil is in the details, when it comes to Lib new laws the little guy is always screwed
  • Thad Wheeler
    commented 2025-06-20 15:12:48 -0400
    @Bernhard Jatzeck you are 100% correct. I don’t believe the provinces ever had a say to be honest. Certain provinces have massive pull if they have the majority of the electorate, so they get a a say. It’s bills like these that create the bate and switch. They get passed under the belief what premiers want will get done, but in reality it’s so the government will get what it wants done. This is how green energy scam projects will get ram rodded to provinces so that they can make their buddies rich and we get handed the bill. Carney has said so as much. How they sell it and what it will deliver will be two different things as are all things in Canadian politics, but they know the majority will fall for it.
  • Bernhard Jatzeck
    commented 2025-06-19 21:00:42 -0400
    Can anyone convince me that Canada’s not a tin-pot dictatorship? Do the provinces no longer have a say, and does the voice of the people mean nothing?