Feds can block ‘nation-building’ projects if conditions not met, says cabinet minister
Opposition groups fear the rushed-through Parliament bill will grant cabinet excessive power to approve favoured industrial projects, overriding other laws.
Controversial Liberal legislation that would allow cabinet to quickly approve major industrial projects, passed committee early Thursday, according to the Canadian Press.
On June 17, Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc told senators that Bill C-5, An Act To Enact The Free Trade And Labour Mobility In Canada Act, aims to accelerate federal approvals for nationally significant projects, eliminating traditional delays to serve the national interest.
“Every day of the election campaign, the prime minister spoke about building big projects in the national interest ... So none of this should surprise Canadians,” LeBlanc said. “There is a great, great deal of enthusiasm from all first ministers,” he added.
However, opposition groups fear the bill, rushed through Parliament, grants cabinet excessive power to approve favoured industrial projects, overriding other laws.
I appeared before the Senate today to speak to the importance of quickly adopting Bill C-5 – our response to this hinge moment for Canada, and a key tool in strengthening our sovereignty and prosperity for decades to come. pic.twitter.com/MDC6401z5t
— Dominic LeBlanc (@DLeBlancNB) June 17, 2025
Senator Leo Housakos criticized the bill, stating it grants a single minister unprecedented power to fast-track projects deemed "of national interest" or delay those refused designation, potentially due to ideological reasons.
LeBlanc disagreed, stating “this bill strikes the right balance.” He earlier claimed that conventional oil pipelines may not be included in future talks.
The Minister clarified that cabinet would seek “consensus” on which projects would be fast-tracked. He did not elaborate, according to Blacklock’s.
LeBlanc informed the Senate that fast-tracking of industrial projects shouldn't strictly define cabinet, asserting the Liberal government presented a "compelling case to Canadians" for its necessity, given the U.S. trade war.
Businesses and building trades support the legislation, citing that project approval often takes longer than construction. C-5, in its current form, would allow first ministers to backload assessments considering "any factor" (Section 5.6).
.@DLeBlancNB tells @Senateca it's "difficult to define" terms of #C5 til it's law. Asked if premiers hold vetoes over new energy projects, Minister replied: 'Vito's is a restaurant in Moncton.' https://t.co/K4P7GNeU9k #cdnpoli pic.twitter.com/zisj2eUzht
— Blacklock's Reporter (@mindingottawa) June 18, 2025
Senator Paula Simons argues Bill C-5 may bypass environmental assessments, though LeBlanc insists assessments are key and non-compliant projects may lack approval.
Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, the only Liberal dissenter, worries that limited testimony time restricts democratic input, while others suggest amendments can come later.
Bill C-5 merges two laws: removing internal trade barriers by Canada Day and fast-tracking "national interest" projects, likely passing the Commons with Conservative support. MP Philip Lawrence calls it a modest step in the right direction, that "barely scratches the surface."
The government talks of big progress, but #BillC5 misses the mark—narrow in scope, light on impact, and full of unanswered questions.
— Senator Leo Housakos (@SenatorHousakos) June 16, 2025
Today in the Senate, Conservatives challenged Minister @cafreeland on this aspirational but sorely lacking bill. WATCH: pic.twitter.com/voeJLno1Gq
Senators criticize the bill's vague "national interest" definition and rushed process, claiming it limits parliamentary debate.
The House of Commons reviewed Bill C-5 from Wednesday afternoon to after midnight, as the Liberal government aims to pass it this week. The Senate plans to complete its review by June 27, though Senator Wallin noted, “This is not our general procedure."
"We would usually send a bill to committee, we would have witnesses, we would take testimony, and we would apply a sober second thought to that bill,” she added.

Alex Dhaliwal
Journalist and Writer
Alex Dhaliwal is a Political Science graduate from the University of Calgary. He has actively written on relevant Canadian issues with several prominent interviews under his belt.
Help fund Alex's journalism!

COMMENTS
-
Fran g commented 2025-07-07 18:58:48 -0400The devil is in the details, when it comes to Lib new laws the little guy is always screwed
-
Thad Wheeler commented 2025-06-20 15:12:48 -0400@Bernhard Jatzeck you are 100% correct. I don’t believe the provinces ever had a say to be honest. Certain provinces have massive pull if they have the majority of the electorate, so they get a a say. It’s bills like these that create the bate and switch. They get passed under the belief what premiers want will get done, but in reality it’s so the government will get what it wants done. This is how green energy scam projects will get ram rodded to provinces so that they can make their buddies rich and we get handed the bill. Carney has said so as much. How they sell it and what it will deliver will be two different things as are all things in Canadian politics, but they know the majority will fall for it.
-
Bernhard Jatzeck commented 2025-06-19 21:00:42 -0400Can anyone convince me that Canada’s not a tin-pot dictatorship? Do the provinces no longer have a say, and does the voice of the people mean nothing?