Health Committee pushes for mandatory pharma conflict of interest disclosures

The proposal follows claims that pharmaceutical lobbyists “infest Parliament Hill,” striving to curb their undue influence through mandatory conflict of interest disclosures.

 

In a parliamentary first, physician MPs on the Commons health committee proposed Tuesday that all witnesses must disclose conflicts of interest before testifying. The motion, driven by concerns over pharmaceutical lobbying, seeks to bring medical-grade transparency to Parliament Hill, as reported by Blacklock’s.

Liberal MP Dr. Marcus Powlowski led the charge, arguing that health committee witnesses should meet the same disclosure standards as medical professionals. “There should be a requirement that any conflict of interest be declared beforehand,” he said, urging bipartisan support. “If the Conservatives are in agreement, we should have it.”

Conservative MP Dr. Matt Strauss endorsed the idea but questioned enforcement, asking if it would be based on the “honour system.”

While supportive, the committee deferred a formal vote.

Liberal MP Dr. Doug Eyolfson also backed the proposal, citing past witnesses who hid funding ties that shaped their testimony. “There would have been a very different context had those conflicts been declared,” he said.

The motion echoes concerns raised during the 2014 passage of Bill C-17, or Vanessa’s Law, which expanded federal powers to ban risky prescription drugs.

Then-Conservative MP Terence Young sponsored the bill after his daughter Vanessa’s tragic death in 2000 from a Health Canada-approved prescription drug for a digestive disorder, which was taken as directed.

Young criticized “drug industry representatives who infest Parliament Hill” for wielding undue influence. Condemning Big Pharma’s unchecked power, he said, “They knew all along that potentially life-threatening drugs were being pushed on patients,” noting no industry executive has faced jail time despite widespread harm.

This proposed rule could set a precedent for accountability, ensuring witnesses’ allegiances are clear. As the health committee deliberates, its physician MPs are united in demanding transparency to protect the public interest.

PETITION: No More Shots!

56,005 signatures
Goal: 75,000 signatures

I demand Canada’s Minister of Health, Marjorie Michel, remove the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from the market. Health Canada has confirmed the presence of an undisclosed plasmid, raising serious safety concerns and invalidating informed consent. I also support the Government of Alberta’s call to halt the vaccines, especially for healthy populations, including young adults and children.

Will you sign?

Tamara Ugolini

Senior Editor

Tamara Ugolini is an informed choice advocate turned journalist whose journey into motherhood sparked her passion for parental rights and the importance of true informed consent. She critically examines the shortcomings of "Big Policy" and its impact on individuals, while challenging mainstream narratives to empower others in their decision-making.

COMMENTS

Showing 4 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Fran g
    commented 2025-07-04 10:57:22 -0400
    BigPharma has had a free ride since 1986. We need to cancel their exemptions from liability. Government and corporations are too captured by BP, either from getting huge payoffs or blackmailing. We, the people, need to take back our rightful health freedoms.
  • Robert Pariseau
    commented 2025-06-18 21:47:15 -0400
    GETTING???!!!
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2025-06-18 21:16:52 -0400
    I hope we get some sort of accountability from these experts. Big pharma is getting too big and powerful.
  • Robert Pariseau
    commented 2025-06-18 15:37:20 -0400
    Guess who’s going to push back?