Liberals pursue broad surveillance powers despite opposition

Critics argue the bill allows sweeping lawful access to personal information without warrants.

The discussion revolves around concerns that Bill C-2, ostensibly aimed at combating hate and protecting borders, grants excessive surveillance powers to authorities, potentially leading to a "police state." 

Critics argue that despite claims of protecting communities and addressing issues like fentanyl trafficking, the bill (and its companion Bill C-12) allows for sweeping lawful access to personal information without warrants.

Specific concerns raised include:

  • Broad Surveillance Powers: The ability of police and intelligence agencies to obtain sensitive information from service providers (doctors, counselors, pharmacists) without a warrant, including details about client relationships, when, and where services were obtained.
  • Lack of Warrant Requirement for Mail and Personal Data: The bill is criticized for potentially allowing authorities to open mail and access personal information, such as subscriber lists for online platforms, without judicial oversight.
  • Government Overreach under the Guise of Public Safety: Speakers express apprehension that the government consistently uses "public safety" and "anti-hate" as pretexts for increased government intrusion, privacy loss, and erosion of freedoms, drawing parallels to measures implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., vaccine passports, restrictions on gatherings).
  • Dystopian Implications: The legislation is described as potentially leading to a "dystopian" society akin to "1984," characterized by extreme government overreach and censorship, similar to concerns raised about the Online Harms Act (Bill C-63).
  • Misplaced Priorities and Ineffective Laws: Critics argue that Canada already has numerous laws to address border security and other issues, which are often not enforced consistently. They believe that new laws are primarily designed to further control citizens and strip rights, rather than genuinely solve problems.

The overall tone of the discussion is one of strong skepticism and alarm regarding the potential impact of Bill C-2 and related legislation on civil liberties and privacy in Canada.

PETITION: Stop Mark Carney’s Bill C-2 — A Direct Attack on Your Privacy

10,424 signatures
Goal: 15,000 signatures

Mark Carney’s new Bill C-2 claims to be about border security, but it’s actually a sweeping attack on Canadians’ privacy. It gives police the power to open your mail and access your online accounts — all without a warrant — and even makes it a crime to use more than $10,000 in cash. This has nothing to do with stopping crime at the border and everything to do with building a surveillance state. Sign the petition now to stop Bill C-2 before it becomes law.

Will you sign?

Livestream Clips

Catch the most impactful clips from our daily news livestream, Rebel Roundup, featuring breaking stories, bold opinions, and exclusive insights from our top reporters. Stay informed and never miss a moment—watch now!

https://www.rebelnews.com/live

COMMENTS

Showing 1 Comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Allan Lang
    followed this page 2025-10-14 09:23:47 -0400
  • Bernhard Jatzeck
    commented 2025-10-13 03:21:11 -0400
    There are laws already on the books that give the government considerable authority in controlling what is said and done in this country. This latest move demonstrates that the Liberals want complete dominance of our lives, thereby making Canada into a Soviet-style police state.

    Sadly, there are enough people in this country who would willingly go along with it, believing it’s for our own good.