Ontario court denies justice for dad after teen DIES SUDDENLY following COVID shot

Justice Antoniani strikes the case, claiming no 'duty of care' owed to Canadians harmed by vaccine mandates.

Tamara Ugolini
  |   March 27, 2025   |   News   |   3 Comments

In a gut-wrenching blow to an Ontario father, Superior Court Justice Sandra Antoniani has dismissed a case against the Department of Health, ruling it owes no “private law duty of care” to Canadians injured by government vaccine policies.

Dan Hartman’s son, Sean, a vibrant 17-year-old hockey enthusiast, died weeks after his COVID-19 shot in 2021, a tragedy the court called “real” but refused to hold anyone accountable.

Sean’s story is a heartbreaking snapshot of a system failing its youth. A healthy teen with no prior conditions, he was rushed to the ER four days after his first Pfizer shot. Despite suffering from vomiting, a rash, and intense pain, he was sent home with nothing more than painkillers and no tests to determine the cause.

Less than a month later, he was found dead beside his bed, with an autopsy revealing a ‘slightly enlarged heart.’ This condition, known as myocarditis, is a now known and documented vaccine risk.

All Sean wanted was to tie up his skates and rediscover the joy he had lost after two years of isolating lockdowns. To do so, he was required to receive a novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccine.

The original court claim leaned on Pfizer’s data, released in April 2021, showing 20 deaths in the vaccinated group versus 14 in the placebo cohort post-unblinding. Public Health Ontario’s numbers later exposed a 1-in-8,500 myocarditis rate in boys aged 12-17 after their second shot — risks that weren’t uncovered in the narrow (and incomplete) clinical trials.

Yet Justice Antoniani justified the ruling, saying the government’s “urgent action” during the pandemic absolved it of liability because it was necessary.

Dan Hartman says he's disgusted. "They're making it life Sean's life didn't matter," he said, voice breaking, "and it's not even worth going to the courtroom to be heard."

"They absolutely owed Sean a duty of care." 

Ontario Doctor Kulvinder Gill labelled the decision a “grave injustice,” slamming unscientific mandates that trashed informed consent while courts prop up Health Canada’s “expertise.”

Lawyer Daniel Freiheit argued the government’s multi-million dollar vaccine injury program (VISP) implies a duty — one it now legally dodges, despite 488 reported deaths post-injection.

This isn’t just Sean’s story, it’s a wake-up call. With adverse events notoriously underreported, the true toll could dwarf official figures. Ontario’s court may have shrugged, but the fight for transparency burns on. If the “honour and integrity of the Crown” isn’t dead, calls for COVID truth and reconciliation will only grow louder.

The government spent millions pushing shots on kids, yet claims no duty when they fall. Real justice demands answers, not excuses, because no parent should bury their child and be told it’s just policy.

Hartman says an appeal of the decision has been filed, and the defendants have 30 days to respond.

PETITION: No More Shots!

54,964 signatures
Goal: 75,000 signatures
meta-img

I demand Canada’s Minister of Health, Mark Holland, remove the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from the market. Health Canada has confirmed the presence of an undisclosed plasmid, raising serious safety concerns and invalidating informed consent. I also support the Government of Alberta’s call to halt the vaccines, especially for healthy populations, including young adults and children.

Will you sign?

Tamara Ugolini

Senior Editor

Tamara Ugolini is an informed choice advocate turned journalist whose journey into motherhood sparked her passion for parental rights and the importance of true informed consent. She critically examines the shortcomings of "Big Policy" and its impact on individuals, while challenging mainstream narratives to empower others in their decision-making.

Featured Stories

COMMENTS

Showing 3 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2025-03-28 21:53:39 -0400
    What an ass that judge is! It’s time big pharma pays for its crookedness. I hope Pierre Poilievre will have the guts to tackle COVID over-reaching rules.
  • S M
    commented 2025-03-28 13:28:52 -0400
    Quote
    “Yet Justice Antoniani justified the ruling, saying the government’s “urgent action” during the pandemic absolved it of liability because it was necessary.”

    This statement could not be further from the truth, the data was there and it was known openly and in the the manufactures own data base, it was in fact the federal government and its health agencies responsibility to ensure they gave the public full disclosure on the harm of this and they didn’t, in fact the harm was intentionally suppressed and “Informed consent” was NEVER given to ANY recipient of the covax.

    All I see is this lack of “Justice” and is this Justice running legal interference for government in order to NOT hold government and their health agencies accountable?

    I see this as just one more example of the high level of corruption and fraud being laid upon Canadians.

    Ask the justice, show me “Informed Consent,” I never put this crap into my body because all the warning signs were there, it was and still is the responsibility of the government to ensure Canadians receive the proper information for “Informed Consent” and this NEVER HAPPENED.

    How is this Justice so ignorant to this, or is this “willful ignorance” to cover a crime, a Crime Against Humanity? This so called “urgent Action” comment by the Justice can be easily torn apart, we the people have to hold all involved accountable, tear the very foundation of their lies and harm apart and they will easily crumble in the weight of their own lies.

    Does ANYONE KNOW HOW TO THINK ANYMORE?

    ps, just shameful, who represented this Man and his murdered Son?
  • Janice Hendriks
    commented 2025-03-28 09:04:03 -0400
    Tamara,thank you so very much for your fearless,intrepid journalism . I would say hands down you are the best health and medical reporter in the country. You take great duty of care to delve deep for the truth, nomatter the consequences. I wish there were more categories in the Best Rebel of the Year Awards. I did vote you best Rebel reporter for 2025. I stand by that nomination,but like Ezra said “it’s like voting which child you like best!!! I made the choice not to vaccinate but I’m severely allergic to most medications. Thank you for giving Canadians like me a voice.