Ottawa Detective Helen Grus found GUILTY of discreditable conduct in vaccine probe case
Renowned for her investigative skill, Grus questioned the integrity of inquiries into infant deaths during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, only to be put on trial for challenging the 'safe and effective' narrative.
Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus has been found guilty of discreditable conduct after a lengthy hearing, in a shocking but to be expected verdict.
Grus, a diligent detective renowned for her investigative prowess, was serving in the Sexual Assault and Child Abuse unit when she was charged with discreditable conduct for accessing police records in what was coined an “unauthorized” investigation into suspicious infant deaths following the 2021 COVID-19 vaccine rollout.
Her probe ultimately leaned on a bombshell piece of evidence: Pfizer’s own trial data revealing a staggering 97% infant fatality rate — yet instead of heeding her concerns, the system slammed her for daring to ask questions.
Perhaps more officers need to review Pfizer's clinical trial data on baby deaths
— Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦 (@TamaraUgo) January 9, 2025
PG 12https://t.co/KdPCzAJMmE pic.twitter.com/kGoQvatiNT
Hearing Officer Chris Renwick, a retired superintendent, called the hearing a mess of “bickers, insults, and objections,” dismissing evidence like Pfizer’s damning data as “irrelevant” in his decision.
He confined his ruling to the narrow charge, sidestepping claims of political motives and police misconduct. “It’s outside my scope,” Renwick insisted, refusing to touch the vaccine scandal or Ottawa Police’s alleged leaks and cover-ups.
Grus’ supporters argue her record access was her duty as a diligent investigator, especially with incomplete case files or instances where new detectives were overseeing complex cases.
Renwick confirmed that Grus did attempt to raise her concerns with the COVID handling and novel modified RNA injection roll out up the chain of command — emailing research to colleagues and executives — only to be branded a meddler with a “personal interest.”
Renwick ruled her efforts undermined public trust, claiming a “reasonable person” would balk at such inquiries into officials, yet this seems like a dodge to many given Pfizer’s repeated misrepresentations of their data, some only released through court order, and a track record of fraud and misconduct.
Grus sought to express concern around this, but the system crushed her.
Her lawyer, Bath Sheba van den Berg, blasted the decision, saying it “sends a message that public officials are above the law.”
Pfizer’s history as a convicted felon, with a $2.3 billion (USD) healthcare fraud settlement for false marketing, cannot be overlooked. Meanwhile, a newly published peer-reviewed paper supports Grus, exposing widespread discrimination against vaccine skeptics and calling for judicial investigations into these serious concerns.


COMMENTS
-
Jamie Perritt commented 2025-03-27 01:10:21 -0400Honestly I didn’t expect her to be found innocent. Although this court verdict is irrelevant.
Obviously she is not guilty of anything. It’s just a bunch of political nonsense.
None of these big figure heads in the freedom movement have and most likely will not be “found innocent”.
I hate to say it, but it doesn’t look good for Tamara and Chris Barber either.
We’re dealing with a bunch of criminals who think they are the law.
So can anyone expect justice? There isn’t any. -
Erika Furney followed this page 2025-03-26 16:47:13 -0400
-
Bruce Atchison commented 2025-03-25 19:51:45 -0400What vax Nazis the prosecution were. They hated their carefully-crafted lie was exposed so they went after this too-honest detective. This will make other conscientious officers think twice before doing anything outside the narrow scope of their duties. I can imagine somebody not helping somebody in medical distress by saying it wasn’t in their job description. Do we want to live in such a world?