Taxpayers WHACKED with $66k legal bill for E-Karen's failure
Australian taxpayers will foot the bill for eSafety Commissioner's legal loss to Elon Musk’s X and Canadian activist Billboard Chris.
The eSafety Commissioner's failed legal battle against Elon Musk’s social media platform X and Canadian activist Chris Elston — better known as Billboard Chris — will cost Australian taxpayers approximately $66,000.
The Administrative Review Tribunal on Tuesday threw out a takedown order issued by Commissioner Julie Inman Grant in response to a controversial post by Elston criticising the World Health Organisation’s inclusion of radical transgender activist Teddy Cook on a policy panel.
In February 2024, Elston shared a post on X stating: “This woman (yes, she’s female) is part of a panel of 20 ‘experts’ hired by the WHO to draft their policy on caring for ‘trans people’. People who belong in psychiatric wards are writing the guidelines for people who belong in psychiatric wards.”
Australia's eSafety Commissioner last year attempted to censor:
— Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV) (@TheMilkBarTV) July 1, 2025
-The Bishop Wakeley attack footage -@BillboardChris' post questioning trans identifying Teddy Cook's fitness to advise on health policy
-@celinevmachine_'s post reporting on a queer club in a primary school
In… pic.twitter.com/dXwUYvhHPq
Inman Grant deemed the post “degrading” and issued a takedown notice to X on March 22, threatening the company with a $782,500 fine if it failed to remove the post. X blocked the content, but subsequently challenged the decision alongside Elston.
On Tuesday, the Tribunal sided with X and Elston, ruling the takedown order invalid. Deputy president Damien O’Donovan stated that there was no evidence Elston intended for Cook to see the post.
“In the absence of any evidence that Mr Elston intended that Mr Cook would receive and read the post, and in light of the broader explanation as to why Mr Elston made the post, I am satisfied that an ordinary reasonable person would not conclude that it is likely that the post was intended to have an effect of causing serious harm to Mr Cook,” the ruling read.
An eSafety spokesperson confirmed the legal challenge had so far cost “approximately $66,000”, and acknowledged the Tribunal’s guidance.
eSafety said it would continue an agenda to "protect Australians from online abuse" while taking the Tribunal’s findings into account.


COMMENTS
-
Bruce Atchison commented 2025-07-04 21:44:19 -0400How unfair to Australian tax payers!