WHISTLEBLOWER: Researcher alleges data integrity issues in Pfizer vaccine trial

Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal COVID-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight, The BMJ reports.

A former research director has blown the whistle on Pfizer's pivotal phase III trial, alleging that Ventavia Research Group — a Texas-based company tasked with performing the Pfizer vaccine trial — repeatedly falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators and was slow to follow up on reported adverse events.

The article published by The BMJ, a highly reputable peer-reviewed medical trade journal, states: 

"Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails."

In her email to the FDA, Jackson raised a number of concerns, including the following:

  • Participants being placed in a hallway after injection and not being monitored by clinical staff

  • Lack of timely follow-up of patients who experienced adverse events

  • Protocol deviations not being reported

  • Vaccines not being stored at proper temperatures

  • Mislabelled laboratory specimens, and

  • Targeting of Ventavia staff for reporting these types of problems

The FDA reportedly replied to Jackson's email within a matter of hours, thanking her for her concerns, but no further investigation appears to have been conducted. 

Another former Ventavia employee, Jill Fisher, told The BMJ that the research company was indeed nervous and expecting a federal audit of its Pfizer vaccine trial:

"People working in clinical research are terrified of FDA audits," Jill Fisher told The BMJ, but added that the agency rarely does anything other than inspect paperwork, usually months after a trial has ended. "I don’t know why they’re so afraid of them," she said. But she said she was surprised that the agency failed to inspect Ventavia after an employee had filed a complaint. “You would think if there’s a specific and credible complaint that they would have to investigate that," Fisher said.

In Pfizer’s briefing document submitted to an FDA advisory committee meeting held on December 10, 2020 to discuss Pfizer’s application for emergency use authorization of its COVID-19 vaccine, the company made no mention of any problems at the Ventavia site. The next day, the FDA issued the emergency use authorization of the vaccine.

The full Pfizer vaccine trial enrolled approximately 44,000 participants across 153 sites that included numerous commercial companies and academic centres. In August of this year, after the full approval of Pfizer’s vaccine, the FDA published a summary of its inspections of the Pfizer trial. Only nine out of the 153 sites were inspected, none of which were Ventavia’s sites.

The FDA’s inspection officer noted:

"The data integrity and verification portion of the BIMO [bioresearch monitoring] inspections were limited because the study was ongoing, and the data required for verification and comparison were not yet available to the IND [investigational new drug]."

Two other former Ventavia employees spoke to The BMJ anonymously, both confirming aspects of Jackson’s statements. One employee said that she had worked on over four dozen clinical trials in her career, including many large trials, but had never experienced such a "helter skelter" work environment as with Ventavia on Pfizer’s vaccine trial.

"I’ve never had to do what they were asking me to do, ever," she told The BMJ. "It just seemed like something a little different from normal — the things that were allowed and expected."

Since Jackson reported the problems with Ventavia to the FDA in September 2020, Pfizer has hired Ventavia as a research subcontractor on four other vaccine clinical trials, including trials for the COVID-19 vaccine in children and young adults, the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women, a COVID-19 booster dose and an RSV vaccine trial.

Do you oppose the use of vaccine passports in Canada? Go to FightVaccinePassports.com to sign our petition, share with us your forced vaccination story and donate to help fund our legal battles against vaccine passports across Canada.

Dakota Christensen

Journalist

Dakota “Dax” Christensen is a writer, editor and reporter for Rebel News. With a love for liberty and a heart for the people, Dakota takes great pleasure in helping bring you the other side of the story.

https://twitter.com/dax_christensen

COMMENTS

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.