Former physician's legal battle for free speech and medical integrity continues

In an ongoing legal fight defending free speech and physician autonomy, former licensed physician Mark Trozzi’s lawyer argues that the right to hold and express minority opinions — especially regarding COVID-19 vaccine exemptions and harmful public health measures — is deeply rooted in constitutional law, with expert testimony affirming that such dissent often shapes the future of medical practice.

Mark Trozzi’s perseverance to clear his character against his regulator's claims could set a precedent for free expression and medical autonomy in Canada. In May 2020, Trozzi went public, albeit anonymously at the time, with his concerns about the COVID-19 narrative, exposing empty hospitals and challenging the government's healthcare crisis claims.

His advocacy after that came at great cost, as the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons (CPSO) revoked his medical license for allegedly spreading “misinformation” and issuing medical exemptions during forced COVID-19 vaccines.

Trozzi's case is emblematic of the broader clash between individual rights and public health mandates. Despite overwhelming censorship, Trozzi has held firm, insisting on transparency and truth, especially in the face of what he believes to be flawed, coercive policies.

The CPSO’s disciplinary tribunal found Trozzi guilty of professional misconduct last fall, but his lawyer, constitutional expert Michael Alexander, has mounted an appeal, challenging the tribunal’s findings before the Divisional Court.

In an exclusive interview with Rebel News, Alexander explained that the CPSO appeared ill-prepared to address Trozzi’s legal challenges, hinting at a case based more on ideology than evidence.

“The college really didn't have much to say about our legal submissions,” said Alexander. “I think overall, we proved our case. And it's up to the court to decide whether, with all the mistakes the college and the tribunal made, there will be a finding of bias. And if there is, then the decision has to go on that basis alone.”

If Dr. Mark Trozzi’s appeal succeeds, it could set a powerful legal precedent that limits the overreach of health colleges and the administrative state in Ontario, and potentially across Canada. Alexander explained that if they lose, an appeal to the Ontario Court of Appeal isn’t automatic, but that a win could establish case law that strengthens the right to free expression, especially for minority opinions in medicine.

This decision, if in their favour, could ripple across the nation, enforcing the Charter’s protections in a way that empowers citizens and curtails government overreach.

PETITION: No More Shots!

43,346 signatures
Goal: 50000 signatures

Please sign our petition to demand that Canada’s Minister of Health, Mark Holland, take the mRNA COVID-19 shots off of the market immediately, following the revelation that Health Canada has confirmed the presence of at least one previously undisclosed plasmid, a residual DNA sequence.

Will you sign?

Tamara Ugolini

Senior Editor

Tamara Ugolini is an informed choice advocate turned journalist whose journey into motherhood sparked her passion for parental rights and the importance of true informed consent. She critically examines the shortcomings of "Big Policy" and its impact on individuals, while challenging mainstream narratives to empower others in their decision-making.

COMMENTS

Showing 1 Comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Robin Naismith
    commented 2024-10-18 15:52:58 -0400
    I for one wish the doctor luck in taking the College to task on this because we all know that the medical community collaberated with our government during the SCAMDEMIC to lie to the public about the Vaccines and I think it is time that the whole truth comes out and all doctors whom fought against this Scam be given their jobs back and licenses be re-issued along with apologies for the damage that the medical colleges perpetrated