Green Party withdrew candidates to prevent Conservative win
The Green Party needed 308 candidates to join the leaders’ debates but only registered 232 by the April 7 Elections Canada deadline.
The Green Party admitted some candidates withdrew to avoid splitting the vote in their Federal Court application protesting debate disqualification.
“A small number of candidates, no more than 15, decided to withdraw their candidacy to avoid splitting the progressive vote,” Green Party lawyers wrote the Court. “All of these challenges had grave and unintended impacts on the number of successfully nominated Green Party candidates to the detriment of the Green Party.”
Parties needed 308 candidates to join the debates, according to the Leaders’ Debates Commission. The Greens initially claimed 340 nominations, but only 232 were registered by the April 7 Elections Canada deadline.
A co-leader of the Green Party calls the Leaders' Debate Commission's decision to remove them from tonight's federal leaders' debate "undemocratic" and demands to be allowed in. pic.twitter.com/FFnLtOXXnT
— Rebel News (@RebelNewsOnline) April 16, 2025
The Green Party is challenging its disqualification from televised debates on April 16 and 17, arguing that the Commission was “unreasonable” in claiming that the party “intentionally and deliberately” withdrew candidates.
Debate organizers note the Greens strategically pulled candidates in some ridings to help progressive candidates win, reported Blacklock’s. Two days prior, a Party organizer confirmed that was the case in comment to the media.
"We could clearly hear from the field that [the] local population, progressives, didn't want a Green candidate running there," Green Party Co-Leader Jonathan Pedneault said of the 15 ridings where the party dropped candidates.
He later called for the Commission “to do the honourable thing and resign.”
Elizabeth May slams the Leaders' Debates Commission's decision to remove the Green Party from the leaders' debates.
— Rebel News (@RebelNewsOnline) April 16, 2025
May demands they allow the Green Party co-leader to participate and says he's going to take the stage despite the decision. pic.twitter.com/LPAwa8MWkF
Green Party MP Elizabeth May expressed disbelief that Greens were excluded from televised debates for the first time in 10 years, emphasizing the significant impact debate participation has on their election results.
Party lawyers cited difficulty finding signatories for nomination papers due to hostility towards vote splitting, intimidation of volunteers, and challenges verifying signatures.
“Our MPs’ offices are fielding questions from voters who wonder if they can still vote for Green Party candidates due to the last minute reversal of the Commission’s earlier rulings, or if their Green vote will be counted,” said Party spokesperson Fabrice Lachance Nové.
The Greens are asking a federal judge to overturn the disqualification, claiming it violated their Charter rights and was unreasonable. No statement of defence has been filed as of writing.
.@CanadianGreens in Court filing admit several candidates withdrew from today's elxn to avoid vote splits tho it meant disqualification from leaders' debates: "15 decided to withdraw." https://t.co/I1r9MGY6XN #cdnpoli pic.twitter.com/2uYnUAIwv3
— Blacklock's Reporter (@mindingottawa) April 28, 2025
The Greens were denied the opportunity to seek injunctive relief in Federal Court due to the leaders' debate being rescheduled two hours earlier and the party only being informed of its exclusion at 7 am that morning.
Parties must submit a list of endorsed candidates 28 days before the general election to ensure “high-quality” debate production and proper political party preparation.
They’re not required to prove their candidates have been formally nominated with Elections Canada.
Green Party co-leader whines about Rebel News "doing its own show" at the post-debate scrum for federal party leaders and accuses the Leaders' Debates Commission of "caving in to political pressure" in its decision to bar the Greens from the debate. pic.twitter.com/VKjixC2Ubb
— Rebel News (@RebelNewsOnline) April 17, 2025
The Commission is currently without a Commissioner, with Michel Cormier, the highest-ranking staff member, fulfilling the role in the interim.
“We thus wonder who is making the final decisions, who is ultimately responsible? Is it the Advisory Board? Is it Mr. Cormier? Who should be held accountable? What is the Commission’s appeal mechanism?” reads an April 18 statement from the Green Party of Canada.
“The Commission is rapidly losing all credibility as an institution that promotes democracy and fairness,” Nové said. “Canadians deserve answers.”

Alex Dhaliwal
Journalist and Writer
Alex Dhaliwal is a Political Science graduate from the University of Calgary. He has actively written on relevant Canadian issues with several prominent interviews under his belt.
Help fund Alex's journalism!

COMMENTS
-
Bernhard Jatzeck commented 2025-04-28 20:41:04 -0400Robert:
Just think—if she wins her seat, she can do the same thing. -
Robert Pariseau commented 2025-04-28 18:42:18 -0400It’s the Conservatives versus absolutely everyone else here.
Worry not, the PPC will never get the support they could have gotten. Not until they change what they do, how they do things, and most important of all, whom their leader is.
Hint: Poilievre started his campaign the instant he became the CPC leader, and he watched exactly what he said and did the whole time. I like that in a leader. So did the more than three in four O’Toole-era defectors that came back. -
Crude Sausage commented 2025-04-28 18:12:38 -0400What this confirms is that the Liberals, Jughead and the new “Democrats” and the ghouls of the Green party are all working together. Heck, I’d wager that even the Conservatives would unite with this scum if the People’s Party got more support.
-
Robert Pariseau commented 2025-04-28 16:04:18 -0400Just think! If she loses her seat, she can spend the whole night in the bar and get sloshed out of her mind!