Bikini deepfakes terrify the government more than rape gangs preying on young girls

It’s another display of bureaucratic hypocrisy: censoring free speech on platforms like X while ignoring a mass-migration disaster of their own making that is inflicting real, physical harm on women and children.

Users on X have been experimenting with Grok, xAI's image generator, prompting it to depict public figures in swimsuits. This tame, albeit embarrassing, display still conforms to Grok's safeguards that prevent full nudity, but that hasn’t stopped these creations from igniting a firestorm among the political class.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer began floating the idea of banning X entirely last week, with the power of the state’s broadcasting regulator, Ofcom, at his beck and call. Leader

Leader of Reform UK, Nigel Farage alludes to how unsurprising this is, given that Western nations have repeatedly attacked free speech at every opportunity.

Secretary Liz Kendall has escalated the rhetoric, announcing plans to criminalize non-consensual intimate images, including AI-generated ones, by week's end.

All of this is being done under the guise of protecting women and girls, despite these same governments overlooking real-world threats they engineered, including migrant-led grooming gangs in the UK that have victimized thousands of young girls, some as young as 12, over decades.

Paralyzed by fears of "racism,” authorities and policy-makers have largely turned a blind eye to these horrific happenings, giving perpetrators slaps on the wrist, lenient sentences… or worse, freedom.

Starmer was allegedly trying to recruit Canada and Australia into the ban in an attempt to send a "powerful message" to Elon Musk.

While Minister Evan Solomon denied any such plans, it’s clear that this effort – coordinated or not – isn’t about protection.

Other AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini offer similar features, and they have not been subjected to this backlash. Instead, the target is X, the last bastion of uncensored truth — the platform that has been exposing migration chaos, government failures, and unfiltered videos that would otherwise be censored or see accounts demonetized on YouTube.

In response, U.S. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna vows sanctions on Starmer and Britain if the ban proceeds, mirroring the same pushback against Brazil's censorship last year.

While Elon Musk has already restricted certain Grok features to paid users; it’s clear that if the government truly cared about safeguarding women, it would prosecute the rape gangs, not pixelated pictures.

Banning X is simply more of the same: a political assault by self-proclaimed champions of “democracy” on anything perceived as a threat to their regime.

Please donate to help Rebel News fight back against the Liberal government's draconian censorship regime!

The Liberals still say they’re committed to bringing in censorship. Bill C-63 would create unprecedented censorship agencies, investigate your online posts, and even impose hate speech restraining orders before words are spoken. Rebel News has fought censorship in courts across Canada, spending over $500,000 on free speech lawyers this year alone. To protect freedom of speech, we’re ready to challenge this law the moment it passes. If you believe in standing up to this censorship, please chip in to our legal defence fund and join the 75,000+ Canadians who have signed our petition. We have to fight this — if we don’t, the law will be used to silence us, and to silence you, too.

Amount
$
Donation frequency

Tamara Ugolini

Senior Editor

Tamara Ugolini is an informed choice advocate turned journalist whose journey into motherhood sparked her passion for parental rights and the importance of true informed consent. She critically examines the shortcomings of "Big Policy" and its impact on individuals, while challenging mainstream narratives to empower others in their decision-making.

COMMENTS

Showing 5 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Tim Kelley
    commented 2026-01-14 00:12:01 -0500
    The lying liberals are a bunch of gutless cowards
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2026-01-13 20:08:21 -0500
    Keir Stürmer more like. What a fascist anti-speech thug! But this is the way of socialists. They want X destroyed because people can speek freely. Socialists also have no sense of fun. What sad and pathetic people they are.
  • Fran g
    commented 2026-01-13 17:45:08 -0500
    I watched Global last night to see what the latest lies they are putting out,and sure enough I heard this rant about X allowing these sexual images and how horrifying it was. I thought to myself something smells here. Well today I learn it is only deepfake bikini shots put out about political leaders. Come on………….these idiots are getting more desperate. Im sure Trump just thought it was funny, but liberals have no sense of humour. And definately the main goal is shutting down X, to silence us.
  • Robin Naismith
    followed this page 2026-01-13 17:36:42 -0500
  • Tim Kelley
    commented 2026-01-13 17:30:12 -0500
    I don’t trust a damn word the liberals say, they cannot be trusted. They do not care about Canada or the Canadian people.
  • Bernhard Jatzeck
    commented 2026-01-12 21:32:46 -0500
    During the 1970s, two TV series were produced in Britain that could easily describe that country today: “The Guardians” and “1990” (the latter starring Edward Woodward). In both of them, there’s a totalitarian government in charge and free speech is banned.

    Considering what’s happening in the U. K., it makes one wonder if Starmer, et. al., watched them for ideas.