Bikini deepfakes terrify the government more than rape gangs preying on young girls
It’s another display of bureaucratic hypocrisy: censoring free speech on platforms like X while ignoring a mass-migration disaster of their own making that is inflicting real, physical harm on women and children.
Users on X have been experimenting with Grok, xAI's image generator, prompting it to depict public figures in swimsuits. This tame, albeit embarrassing, display still conforms to Grok's safeguards that prevent full nudity, but that hasn’t stopped these creations from igniting a firestorm among the political class.
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer began floating the idea of banning X entirely last week, with the power of the state’s broadcasting regulator, Ofcom, at his beck and call. Leader
Leader of Reform UK, Nigel Farage alludes to how unsurprising this is, given that Western nations have repeatedly attacked free speech at every opportunity.
'What is happening in 21st-century Britain?!'
— GB News (@GBNEWS) January 9, 2026
Leader of Reform UK Nigel Farage says calls to ban X in the UK are 'appalling'.
📺 Freeview 236, Sky 512, Virgin 604
Become a Friend of GB News: https://t.co/RxzT9yFXwS pic.twitter.com/tU2Lcnqcgp
Secretary Liz Kendall has escalated the rhetoric, announcing plans to criminalize non-consensual intimate images, including AI-generated ones, by week's end.
🚨 BREAKING: Technology Secretary Liz Kendall says creating ”non-consensual intimate images”, including with Grok, will be made illegal this week pic.twitter.com/6vgA4HC3AP
— Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) January 12, 2026
All of this is being done under the guise of protecting women and girls, despite these same governments overlooking real-world threats they engineered, including migrant-led grooming gangs in the UK that have victimized thousands of young girls, some as young as 12, over decades.
Paralyzed by fears of "racism,” authorities and policy-makers have largely turned a blind eye to these horrific happenings, giving perpetrators slaps on the wrist, lenient sentences… or worse, freedom.
Starmer was allegedly trying to recruit Canada and Australia into the ban in an attempt to send a "powerful message" to Elon Musk.
While Minister Evan Solomon denied any such plans, it’s clear that this effort – coordinated or not – isn’t about protection.
Contrary to media reports, Canada is not considering a ban of X. https://t.co/LtQanuT4xm
— Evan Solomon (@EvanLSolomon) January 11, 2026
Other AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini offer similar features, and they have not been subjected to this backlash. Instead, the target is X, the last bastion of uncensored truth — the platform that has been exposing migration chaos, government failures, and unfiltered videos that would otherwise be censored or see accounts demonetized on YouTube.
In response, U.S. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna vows sanctions on Starmer and Britain if the ban proceeds, mirroring the same pushback against Brazil's censorship last year.
If Starmer is successful in banning @X in Britain, I will move forward with legislation that is currently being drafted to sanction not only Starmer, but Britain as a whole. This would mirror actions previously taken by the United States in response to foreign governments… https://t.co/yUQp8sQGy5
— Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (@RepLuna) January 9, 2026
While Elon Musk has already restricted certain Grok features to paid users; it’s clear that if the government truly cared about safeguarding women, it would prosecute the rape gangs, not pixelated pictures.
Banning X is simply more of the same: a political assault by self-proclaimed champions of “democracy” on anything perceived as a threat to their regime.
COMMENTS
-
Tim Kelley commented 2026-01-14 00:12:01 -0500The lying liberals are a bunch of gutless cowards -
Bruce Atchison commented 2026-01-13 20:08:21 -0500Keir Stürmer more like. What a fascist anti-speech thug! But this is the way of socialists. They want X destroyed because people can speek freely. Socialists also have no sense of fun. What sad and pathetic people they are.
-
Fran g commented 2026-01-13 17:45:08 -0500I watched Global last night to see what the latest lies they are putting out,and sure enough I heard this rant about X allowing these sexual images and how horrifying it was. I thought to myself something smells here. Well today I learn it is only deepfake bikini shots put out about political leaders. Come on………….these idiots are getting more desperate. Im sure Trump just thought it was funny, but liberals have no sense of humour. And definately the main goal is shutting down X, to silence us. -
Robin Naismith followed this page 2026-01-13 17:36:42 -0500 -
Tim Kelley commented 2026-01-13 17:30:12 -0500I don’t trust a damn word the liberals say, they cannot be trusted. They do not care about Canada or the Canadian people. -
Bernhard Jatzeck commented 2026-01-12 21:32:46 -0500During the 1970s, two TV series were produced in Britain that could easily describe that country today: “The Guardians” and “1990” (the latter starring Edward Woodward). In both of them, there’s a totalitarian government in charge and free speech is banned.
Considering what’s happening in the U. K., it makes one wonder if Starmer, et. al., watched them for ideas.