Judge rules Pastor James Coates' Charter rights were NOT violated by public health orders

Remove Ads

Pastor James Coates received a judge's decision this morning, June 7, on the Charter arguments made by his lawyers from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, Leighton Grey and James Kitchen. A provincial judge in Alberta has deemed that Pastor James Coates' Charter rights were not violated by the public health orders placed on religious gatherings.

Sheila Gunn Reid provides a recap of the decision in the video above.

You can review our live coverage of the pastor's hearing by clicking below:

May 3, 2021: Pastor James Coates on trial for violating public health orders

May 4, 2021: Pastor James Coates on trial for violating public health orders

Here's what our reporter Sheila Gunn Reid has to say on this breaking news.

(10:21 am ET / 8:21 am MT)

Pastor James Coates will receive a judge's decision on Charter arguments made by his lawyers from the JCCF, Leighton Grey and James Kitchen. I'll be live tweeting proceedings at 930 MST

Slight delay.

(12:10 pm ET / 10:10 am MT)

The prosecutor in the Coates case continues to remain anonymous in court hearings. She's not a victim and she's not prosecuting the mob. She's prosecuting a pastor for not turning away congregants My guess: She's ashamed of herself. She should be.

The court has posted the wrong video link twice for the Coates trial. They're approaching a one hour delay
Good gracious. I think the courts have the WebEx system sorted now. Third time's the charm, as they say Just waiting for the decision about whether Pastor James Coates charter rights were violated when he was arrested and jailed for 35 days for breaching covid health orders.
Hearing for judge's decision in the case of James Coates charter arguments is over an hour and fifteen minutes late to start. They've given out the wrong WebEx link twice. Lawyers don't have video feed access yet. It's mass confusion. What a joke
I'm only speculating, but I think this mass confusion and limiting journalists and observers of the Coates hearing to just audio, coupled with the musical chairs of rotating video links, are all because the crown prosecutor doesn't want anyone to know her name or see her face.
You don't get to tell people how to worship. There are different churches and different denominations because there are different interpretations of the same Bible government doesn't get to choose which interpretation is right. It's literally the purpose of freedom of religion
(12:55 pm ET / 10:55 am MT)
Oh man, court is just starting now. It brings the entire judicial process into disrepute when they cant even get their act together in 2021 for public court hearings.
Judge Robert Shaigec is the judge on the file.
Crown prosecutor Karen Thorsrud remains anonymous wi Judge Shaigec identifying her simply as the "public health prosecutor". Pastor Coates is listening via tele-link
Shaigec is now introducing his decision by rehashing the case against Coates. "James Coates contends his rights were infringed because religious services were limited"
"It is admitted by Pastor Coates that he committed the offense charged (Dec 20 unrestricted in person church attendance)"
"In the hours following his arrest, Coates had a bail hearing, and Coates was granted bail on the condition that he follow the orders of the CMOH" The conditions were upheld on appeal. And Coates never did sign his bail conditions.
"Coates deeply held religious convictions...." "Sunday worship is a matter of obedience to Christ." "He defied the law because he felt compelled to comply with God" "He became convinced that the government's response to covid-19 was an overreaction"
"in the end, Coates opined that the covid-19 restrictions are in part of an agenda to transform our nation."
"the charter protects a complex of interacting values, more or less fundamental" "At its core, this case is about freedom of religion"
"freedom of religion is subject to such limitations that are necessary to protect public safety...health or morals...."
"I accept the sincerity of Pastor Coates' religious convictions. "
"The constitutionality of the 15% capacity law will be determined later in this trial" "However, did the enforcement of the law violate his religious freedom" "The answer is no" (There you have it)
"the ticketing process was quick and respectful" "But it was Pastor Coates who drew attention to the police presence" at the church. (Because you totally wouldn't notice the cops in your church without somebody pointing it out to you? Wut?)
"Section 176 does not dig a moat around places of worship to prevent enforcement of laws"
Shaigec now ruling that freedom of expression was not violated by limiting the method of worship.
Shaigec now ruling that Coates' right to liberty was not violated either, when he was forced to agree to bail conditions that violated his conscience or stay in jail. (He was in jail for 35 days) "It was Mr Coates' choice to make".
Judgement is handed down. Bad news all around. Written judgement will be available later. Moving into scheduling for the next phase of the trial.
Video update coming soon. I hope the Alberta Justice Minister wrestles with his conscience after today. He sent two lawyers to fight James Coates.
Remove Ads
Remove Ads

  • By Sheila Gunn Reid

PETITION: Free Pastor James

21,878 signatures
Goal: 25,000 Signatures

Add signature
  • By Ezra Levant

FIGHT THE FINES!

2479 Donors
Goal: 2500 Donors

Donate

Don't Get Censored

Big Tech is censoring us. Sign up so we can always stay in touch.

Remove Ads