B.C.'s oil tanker ban exposed: Why U.S. oil gets a pass but Alberta doesn't

Ezra Levant, Drea Humphrey and Sheila Gunn Reid question B.C.'s tanker ban and the federal government's latest pipeline proposal, arguing the rules favour foreign oil over Canadian energy.

B.C.'s oil tanker ban is once again under scrutiny as questions mount over why it restricts Alberta crude while allowing foreign oil shipments to pass through the province's coast.

Drea Humphrey argued that Premier David Eby has emerged as the biggest winner from the latest pipeline discussions between Alberta and Ottawa. "He's getting exactly what he wanted," she said, pointing to billions in promised infrastructure spending while any potential pipeline benefits remain years away.

Humphrey also questioned the province's opposition to transporting Alberta oil by tanker, noting that large foreign vessels already travel the same waters. "How is that any less of a risk to the North Coast?" she asked.

Sheila Gunn Reid argued the federal approach ignores what she sees as an obvious alternative. She noted that American tankers from Alaska are permitted to use the same coastal route, saying, "The tanker ban only applies to Alberta oil. It doesn't apply to American oil."

Rather than reviving the cancelled Northern Gateway route to Kitimat, Gunn Reid said the proposed pipeline would head south to Vancouver, making it "infinitely more expensive and inconvenient."

"I refuse to see this as the win everybody is touting it as," she added. "It's likely never going to get built."

Livestream Clips

Catch the most impactful clips from our daily news livestream, Rebel Roundup, featuring breaking stories, bold opinions, and exclusive insights from our top reporters. Stay informed and never miss a moment—watch now!

https://www.rebelnews.com/live

COMMENTS

Showing 3 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2026-07-06 19:55:02 -0400
    We have self-hating idiots in power. A proper government would act to better the economy and the lot of its citizens. It would promote our great past and work for a prosperous future. But socialists have reprobate and retrograde minds. So today’s misery is the inevitable result.
  • Fran g
    commented 2026-07-06 11:30:18 -0400
    When this mou was proposed months ago I hoped it wouldnt got through as anything involving liberals is always going to cost 2 or 3 times the original cost, trudumb stopped halfway the pipeline to the south so where is the guarantee carnage will not do the same, pathways bullshit carbon capture will cost billions extra and other countries will not pay the inflated price as they are smart enough to know its ridiculous (us taxpayers are left holding the bills). I am disappointed that Smith is falling for this, is she so desperate?
  • Bernhard Jatzeck
    commented 2026-07-05 23:07:11 -0400
    It’s all part of the war waged against Alberta ever since it rejected PET in the 1972 election.