Five rulings and policies setting troubling precedents for Canada
Recent court rulings and federal policies—from immigration programs to speech penalties—are raising questions about Canada’s direction and intensifying separatist sentiment in Alberta.
Canada in 2026 can be summed up in five short stories.
In Ontario, a judge has ruled that the sex offender registry is unconstitutional. The registry exists to track dangerous criminals after release and is supported by public opinion and legislation. Yet a single unelected judge overturned it.
In Quebec, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled 8-1 that Quebec discriminated against asylum seekers by denying them taxpayer-funded daycare. Elected politicians had prioritized Quebec families, but the court disagreed, requiring Canadians to subsidize daycare for many who entered the country irregularly.
In Ottawa, a federal program will grant 33,000 foreign workers permanent residency, despite their original status as temporary. The government says this reduces temporary workers, but the change does little for Canadians searching for their first job.
In British Columbia, the federal government negotiated land deals recognizing Indigenous title over large areas of B.C. without meaningful public consultation. Legal experts have called the process unacceptable.
A fifth story also in British Columbia involved Former Chilliwack school trustee Barry Neufeld, who was fined $750,000 by the Human Rights Tribunal for opposing gender ideology in schools. The fine was for speech, not threats or violence.
The common theme in these stories? None of these stories happened in Alberta, but all of them set a troubling trajectory for Canada's current priorities.
Meanwhile, Alberta is moving in a different direction. The province is strengthening free speech protections for professionals — what some call “Peterson’s Law.” This means that doctors, lawyers, engineers and other professionals won’t lose their licences for expressing controversial political opinions unrelated to their work.
Alberta is expanding freedom while the rest of Canada restricts it. It's no wonder that Albertans are looking to potentially separate. Would you want to stay?
To watch the full episode of The Ezra Levant Show, become a subscriber at www.RebelNewsPlus.com.
RebelNews+ Clips
RebelNews+ is our premium subscription service, which gives you access to our exclusive long form, TV-style shows, documentaries, members-only comments section, and the ability to read RebelNews.com without ads.
Subscribe now to get the full experience!
https://rebelnewsplus.com/
COMMENTS
-
Bruce Atchison commented 2026-03-09 22:36:39 -0400Stop the world please. I want to get off.
-
Melvyn Schobel commented 2026-03-09 06:33:29 -0400What’s the common theme? White colored skin is trash. The courts are taking Canada in a direction that destroys Canadian values. You have to ask what is motivating these judges to adopt this line of thinking. Ever since we have allowed uncontrolled migration, the courts have gone out of their way to protect them, whether they are legal or illegal. By applying the rule of law equally, regardless of skin colour, what percent would be white or colored? The theme in all the incidents mentioned has to do with skin colour. The whites have not committed any crimes, but they end up being the guilty ones. Once, I was proud to be a Canadian, but that image has been tarnished.