Ontario judge’s injunction keeps drug consumption sites open near schools amid Charter fight

Taxpayers are bankrolling both sides of the legal battle as addiction and the opioid crisis continue to spiral out of control.

An Ontario judge has granted an injunction, allowing so-called “safe consumption sites” near schools and daycares to remain open, defying government closure plans as a Charter challenge unfolds. This ruling, handed down on March 28, 2025, keeps 10 sites operational while the court debates whether drug users have a “right” to use deadly substances in taxpayer-funded spaces.

Last August, Ontario Health Minister Sylvia Jones unveiled a bold shift in drug policy under Bill 223, the Safer Streets, Stronger Communities Act. The province banned consumption sites within 200 meters of schools and daycares, committing $378 million into 19 Homelessness and Addiction Recovery Treatment (HART) Hubs.

Jones layered this atop of the province's existing $3.8 billion “Roadmap to Wellness” and the nearly $700 million dedicated to housing initiatives each year, promising to prioritize recovery over harm reduction. Yet, overdose deaths have surged 68% from 2018 to 2022 — eight lives lost daily — while multi-substance fatalities spiked 167%, exposing the failure of “safer supply” fantasies.

Enter The Neighbourhood Group (TNG), a Toronto-based “charity” running the Kensington Market Overdose Prevention Site. TNG, which pockets $24.4 million in provincial grants annually — with 81% of its budget coming from government, i.e. taxpayer funds — is suing Ontario, claiming the ban violates addicts’ Charter rights.

TNG CEO Bill Sinclair, pulling in over $230,000 yearly, argues that his agency co-locating a daycare and drug consumption site nearby proves that this practice is safe everywhere.  However, legal proceedings initiated by South Riverdale residents, where a mother was gunned down in drug-related crossfire near a site last year, beg to differ.

Many are increasingly seeing these sites as magnets for chaos, not solutions. Recent data shows that British Columbia’s “safer supply” experiment saw opioid hospitalizations soar 58% post-decriminalization. Ontario’s data mirrors this grim reality; harm reduction isn’t reducing harm, it’s amplifying it.

Yet, TNG’s legal team insists that closing these sites endangers lives, which seems to lean more on emotional pleas than evidence.

And it’s law-abiding taxpayers that are bankrolling all of it.

TNG’s operating budget shows $50 million in salaries and $10 million in benefits, dwarfing its $6.4 million in program costs. Charity Intelligence Canada gives it a whopping three-star “below-average” rating, with no demonstrated impact and a C+ for results reporting.

This mediocre and highly subsidized charity has the gall to sue the same government they’re funded by while courts and bureaucrats burn through endless public cash. Meanwhile, addiction festers, and kids dodge needles near playgrounds.

This isn’t compassion — it’s more of a racket.

Ontario’s judge may delay closures, but the real crime is a system where profiteers and drug pushers thrive, and taxpayers foot the bill for the deadly substances, the antidotes, and the body bags.

 

PETITION: Fix Our Cities!

12,262 signatures
Goal: 20,000 signatures

Canada's urban centres are spiraling into decay and chaos, with rampant crime, open drug use, and rising poverty turning once-desirable cities into places of fear. From violent knife attacks on Toronto’s public transit to open-air drug markets in Vancouver, these cities are becoming unrecognizable and unsafe, especially for families. Homeless encampments now dominate public parks and playgrounds, where drug paraphernalia litters spaces meant for children. And it’s not just Toronto and Vancouver — cities across the country are suffering as law and order give way to failed progressive policies. Sign our petition and follow our reporters as we investigate the true causes behind this urban decay and reveal what the mainstream media won’t.

Will you sign?

Tamara Ugolini

Senior Editor

Tamara Ugolini is an informed choice advocate turned journalist whose journey into motherhood sparked her passion for parental rights and the importance of true informed consent. She critically examines the shortcomings of "Big Policy" and its impact on individuals, while challenging mainstream narratives to empower others in their decision-making.

COMMENTS

Showing 1 Comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2025-04-01 18:21:49 -0400
    How would this judge feel if a drug consumption site was right next door?