Poilievre loses Carleton riding amid Conservative gains

Poilievre lost to the Liberal challenger by 42,374 votes to 38,581.

 

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre lost to his Liberal challenger in the Ontario riding of Carleton, which he has held for two decades.

A Globe and Mail column earlier suggested Poilievre's Ottawa-area riding is at risk, a claim that one Parliamentary staffer refutes. “I'm calling bullshit,” they said on social media.

Internal polling shows that Poilievre and Liberal candidate Bruce Fanjoy are in a dead heat in the Carleton riding, according to a senior federal Liberal. The Conservative leader won with 52% of the vote in 2021, up six percentage points from 2019.

Poilievre will likely lose his leadership position if he loses his Carleton riding, according to media reports, with the Liberals winning or leading in 168 seats. 

The Tory incumbent lost to Fanjoy by 42,374 votes to 38,581.

Poilievre faces 90 challengers due to a protest by the Longest Ballot Committee. Results may be delayed, and spoiled ballots may increase.

Elections Canada has implemented special measures to facilitate voting in the riding.

A senior Liberal insider says Liberal candidate Fanjoy is in a dead heat with Poilievre, at 48% and 49%, respectively, according to a poll of 381 people with a margin of error of +/- 3%.

An internal poll completed last Tuesday shows the Liberals hold a 53% to 31% advantage over the Conservatives in Ottawa-area ridings, with the NDP at 10%. Those results excluded the Carleton riding.

Last week, Conservative spokesman Simon Jefferies dismissed concerns that Poilievre could lose the riding, expressing confidence in his reelection. He emphasized that while “no riding is taken for granted,” many volunteers and staff are actively working across Ottawa's ridings.

Nik Nanos of Nanos Research told the Globe that Poilievre can't remain leader if he loses the election, or his own riding.

“Let’s face it, there are going to be a lot of Conservatives who will not forget that he had a 27-per-cent advantage and people point to his personal lack of popularity,” Nanos said. “His message for change is popular but they are not enthusiastic about him.”

Mark Carney will serve as prime minister in a minority government. The Liberals fell short of a 172-seat majority.

Please help me stop Mark Carney — before it’s too late!

Mark Carney wasn’t elected — he was installed by the global elites. And now that he’s in charge, they think they’ve won. But not if we have anything to say about it. While the bought-and-paid-for media slobber over their new golden boy, we’re hitting the streets, digging into his World Economic Forum playbook, and calling out the radical agenda they’re trying to ram down Canada’s throat. This is the fight of our lives — and we’re not backing down. Help us keep our reporters on the ground, our billboard truck on the move, and our message uncensored. Pitch in now if you want to stop Mark Carney before he does irreversible damage.

Amount
$

Alex Dhaliwal

Journalist and Writer

Alex Dhaliwal is a Political Science graduate from the University of Calgary. He has actively written on relevant Canadian issues with several prominent interviews under his belt.

Help fund Alex's journalism!

COMMENTS

Showing 8 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Crude Sausage
    commented 2025-04-30 10:23:33 -0400
    As far as I know, even if you pump the list of candidates, the party they belong to is still written underneath their name. I truly believe that this is the result of Fanjoy playing a smarter game than Poilièvre. Still, Poilièvre proved that he is a popular candidate. Gaining as much support as Mulroney got in 1988 is impressive. He should stick around and wait for the Liberal/NDP tyranny to reveal itself as the incompetence force we know it is so that the elderly can realize that Carney is not the second coming.
  • Bernhard Jatzeck
    commented 2025-04-29 23:31:26 -0400
    Can someone convince me that having so many “candidates” on the ballot in his riding wasn’t a Liberal dirty trick?
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2025-04-29 21:58:22 -0400
    Good point, Robert. Poilievre did speak about impossibly high rents but he didn’t say much about how they’d be either lowered or people would have the money to afford rent.
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2025-04-29 21:56:51 -0400
    We who loved Canada BEFORE Justin the Turd reigned must back Pierre Poilievre. He’s the only leader with the reach and ability to turn the country around. Let’s stop Canada from being California north.
  • Tracy Robinson
    commented 2025-04-29 18:14:42 -0400
    Carney was leader of the liberal party without a riding. Does Pierre have to lose his leadership role because he lost his riding?
  • Fran g
    commented 2025-04-29 16:33:50 -0400
    Pierre has to stay on, he will win after another year of broken promises and disaster has hopefully awakened the east. I am still in shock and deep sadness. So looking forward to all the many reversals of Liberal bullshit. If Carnage had got in with a majority I would have definatly wanted separation, as Canada would collapse under his ideologies. Minority win, I will stick around with Pierre guidance to turn this around in a year. Pretty hard to cure STUPID but we can do it. Fucking Carbon is NOT my prime minister.
  • Robert Pariseau
    commented 2025-04-29 15:06:04 -0400
    Perhaps if he supported renters instead of homeowners?
  • Robert Pariseau
    commented 2025-04-29 15:06:01 -0400
    Perhaps if he supported renters instead of homeowners?