STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE: The Carney vote results cannot be trusted

Ezra Levant looks at the results from the Liberal leadership contest and is left wondering if foul play was involved, given Mark Carney's nearly uniform performance across the country, including in ridings by long-time ministers like Chrystia Freeland and Karina Gould.

I was surprised when Mark Carney got 85.9% of the Liberal leadership vote. Few Canadians know much about Carney, including most Liberals. I was even more surprised that Chrystia Freeland, Trudeau’s high-profile lieutenant for nearly a decade, couldn’t even get 10% of her party’s vote.

But the more I looked into it, the more incredible the “official” numbers were.

Take this one: in Chrystia Freeland’s own Toronto riding of University-Rosedale, she got just 11.8% of the vote, and Mark Carney got 83%.

In terms of raw numbers, in her own district — where she and her family live, where she’s best-known — she got a grand total of just 188 people to vote for her. In a district with more than 100,000 people.

It’s the same thing for Karina Gould, another cabinet minister. She’s from Burlington, Ontario. Her whole life and family are there. But according to the Liberals, only 190 people supported her. Mark Carney crushed her.

And then I started looking through every single district.

Carney’s vote was suspiciously similar in every single one of the 338 ridings in Canada. In rural ridings or big cities; in the east or the west or the north or the Atlantic; in French-speaking ridings or English-speaking.

Carney won every single district — and his vote never fluctuated by much. I’ve been poring over these results all morning and I just don’t think it’s statistically possible.

We need an audit. It’s one thing for the Liberal Party to allow irregularities in their system, but this is choosing our next prime minister. There are so many questions that need to be answered, including how the Liberals disqualified MOST of the people who signed up to vote.

The Liberals say they had nearly 400,000 people “registered” but only a fraction of that — just over 150,000 — were verified and had their vote counted.

Why were most voters disqualified? Was it fraud? Were they impersonating someone? Were they fake accounts? Were they trying to vote from a foreign country? Who was in charge of deciding who could vote or not? How were hundreds of thousands of individual votes handled in a matter of hours — was it by computer program? Who wrote that program — and was it hacked?

Who certified the vote? Were there any scrutineers? I don’t trust it. It needs to be audited — and not by some Liberal-appointed consultant, and not by the partisan hacks at Elections Canada.

This needs to be audited by the RCMP and CSIS. This is so sketchy, we could even use some foreign observers. I simply do not believe that Mark Carney received such a uniform vote count in every single district in the country — including the home districts of Freeland and Gould.

As much as I don’t like Freeland or Gould, I simply don’t believe that neither of them could muster even 200 votes in their own ridings. Seriously, do you believe that Chrystia Freeland only got 188 votes in her home riding — but that Mark Carney received 1,322 there?

Do you doubt that Chinese government hackers would be able to interfere with the Liberal Party’s online voting system? They have the means, the motive and the opportunity.

These results cannot be trusted. You’re more likely to flip a coin and get heads 100 times in a row than get the perfect result that Mark Carney got.

This stinks, and we need an audit to find out what's going on.

Audit Mark Carney's Liberal Leadership Election

16,439 signatures
Goal: 20,000 signatures

Canada's Liberal Party has disclosed that out of 400,000 registered Liberals, only 150,000 have been approved for participation in the online leadership race, leaving 250,000 disqualified under unclear and opaque criteria. Arbitrary verification standards, potential voter suppression, and even hints of foreign interference have raised serious questions regarding the legitimacy of this process. We call on Elections Canada, CSIS and the RCMP to immediately conduct a comprehensive forensic audit to restore transparency, ensure accountability, and guarantee that every legitimate vote is properly considered in shaping Canada’s political future.

Will you sign?

Ezra Levant

Rebel Commander

Ezra Levant is the founder and owner of Rebel News and the host of The Ezra Levant Show. He is the author of multiple best-selling books, including Ethical Oil, The Libranos, China Virus, and most recently, Trudeau's Secret Plan.

COMMENTS

Showing 8 Comments

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Dale Forrest
    commented 2025-03-11 10:14:34 -0400
    @Bruce, i think that it is reminiscent of communist mono-party (fake) elections because it’s a softcore version of the same thing. it looks exactly like what it is, except to the people who are trapped in the fake-news media (CBC, CTV, etc.). i hope-hope-hope that we do not see the same thing as what is happening in some places in Europe when we vote (whenever that happens). the entire thing reeks of the CCP and the CCP has been playing this same game since the beginning of the Internet.
  • Bernhard Jatzezck
    commented 2025-03-10 21:06:45 -0400
    Can everyone say “stolen”? (But Biden won his election legitimately. Riiiiiiiight…..)
  • Robert Pariseau
    commented 2025-03-10 20:28:09 -0400
    Dead Skunk in the Middle of the Road…
  • Bruce Atchison
    commented 2025-03-10 19:35:23 -0400
    The fix was in all along. I agree with Ezra that it’s like flipping a coin and having it come up heads every time. It reminds me of communist country elections where the ruling party wins by a landslide.
  • Peter Wrenshall
    commented 2025-03-10 18:33:14 -0400
    Is Mark carney, literally, the Manchurian Candidate?
  • Peter Wrenshall
    commented 2025-03-10 18:24:10 -0400
    There is no question this stinks to high heaven. At the most basic level I do not trust this process – it looks more like a high-tech coup than a legitimate democratic process.
  • Robert Pariseau
    commented 2025-03-10 18:17:54 -0400
    No matter what they have to say, what they have to do, where they have to go, this is all about staying in power at any cost.
  • Dale Forrest
    commented 2025-03-10 17:21:12 -0400
    the censorship is hardcore on YouTube on this video. multiple comments by people and none are visible.

    what stood out to me in the televised portion of the vote was that: Chretien and Trudeau spoke longer than the candidates and Carney said almost nothing.

    the numbers do indeed look weird. it’s possible that they are real but i suspect people were told who to vote for. this smells like manipulation.