Injunction pauses Alberta’s law to protect kids from gender treatments
Justice Kuntz halted Bill 26's implementation following a Charter challenge by Egale Canada and other groups, despite exemptions allowing approved 16- and 17-year-olds and those already receiving treatment to continue.
Alberta is weighing "all options" after the Court of King's Bench halted legislation banning gender transition procedures for minors. Saskatchewan faced a similar injunction, then invoked the notwithstanding clause last year.
On June 27, Justice Allison Kuntz granted an injunction against Bill 26, part of the Health Statutes Amendment Act, which was set to prohibit regulated health professionals from prescribing hormone therapies to minors for gender dysphoria or gender incongruence starting in early 2025.
This followed a Charter challenge by Egale Canada, the Skipping Stone Foundation, and five Alberta families, even though the legislation outlines Ministerial Order exemptions for 16- and 17-year-olds with parental, physician, and psychologist approval, as well as for minors already prescribed such therapies.
Time for the notwithstanding clause pic.twitter.com/jJvXVgiFxD
— Sheila Gunn Reid (@SheilaGunnReid) June 28, 2025
Kuntz stated the law's issues required a court hearing and a temporary halt to prevent "irreparable" harm to youth, according to the Epoch Times.
Heather Jenkins, spokesperson for the minister of justice, told Rebel News the province will “vigorously defend their position in court” and is “considering all options” with respect to the court’s decision.
She clarified the act was legislated “to protect children and youth when making life-altering and potentially irreversible adult decisions about their bodies.”
Premier Smith welcomed a court debate on her June 28 radio show, but fell short of backing the notwithstanding clause as an option to uphold the legislative changes.
.@SheilaGunnReid asked Premier Smith if she'll follow Sask. and use the notwithstanding clause to enshrine the UCP's new parental rights legislation.
— Rebel News (@RebelNewsOnline) November 2, 2024
She's hopeful about not invoking the clause, and that courts will see it as a "reasonable" change.https://t.co/vuu2u10GNz pic.twitter.com/F6UdMpggT1
“We'll see how that goes, but it isn't going to be implemented right off the clock,” Smith told Rebel News last November 2. The comments follow Saskatchewan invoking the clause last fall to protect parental rights in all school environments.
A 2023 Leger poll found nearly half (46%) of Canadians support provincial governments using the notwithstanding clause to legally enshrine parental consent on 'gender identity' matters.
Only 37% backed invoking the clause to ban all school discussions on sexual orientation and 'gender identity.'
Smith has frequently said parents have a right to protect their “child’s innocence” from “issues of sexuality.”
A recent survey on age-inappropriate materials ridiculed access to sexually crude literature in school libraries.

Alex Dhaliwal
Journalist and Writer
Alex Dhaliwal is a Political Science graduate from the University of Calgary. He has actively written on relevant Canadian issues with several prominent interviews under his belt.
Help fund Alex's journalism!

COMMENTS
-
Bruce Atchison commented 2025-06-30 19:30:49 -0400What a wicked injunction! Children are unable to make life-changing decisions on their own. In fact, the human brain isn’t fully developed until age 25. So these evil people with their injunction are putting disturbed children at risk. I hope a class action sues the butts off these wicked pushers of perversion.