CBC pushes 'safer supply' propaganda in latest documentary
The CBC produced a partisan, taxpayer-funded film advocating for the reinstatement of the Liberal 'safer supply' drug policy, which funds addicts' ongoing use of synthetic opioids.

The CBC's Fifth Estate, “Canada’s premier investigative documentary program,” recently aired a 43-minute film on the country's “safer supply” drug strategy. Despite its claim of impartiality, the documentary is heavy-handed harm reduction propaganda, proving yet again why the CBC should be defunded.
“Safer supply” provides addicts with free, pharmaceutical-grade drugs — typically hydromorphone, a heroin-strength synthetic opioid, but sometimes fentanyl— a policy meant to curb the use of riskier illicit substances.
The federal government quietly ended its safer supply pilot programs earlier this year after reports, investigations, and police action showed patients were widely reselling their 'safer supply' stash to buy illicit fentanyl. This diversion reportedly flooded communities with the highly addictive and potent opioids, ultimately benefiting organized crime at taxpayers' expense.
The CBC overtly opposed the policy change, producing the partisan film, “The political war on safe drugs,” to call for a reinstatement of funding. Their thesis was that safer supply is a wonderful, evidence-based policy and Conservative opposition is rooted in reactionary politics and scientific ignorance.
“The most important thing to know about the documentary is that it excludes any experts who oppose safer supply,” writes columnist Adam Zivo, author of several exposés into purported harm reduction.
Over the past two years, numerous prominent addiction doctors have published open letters and spoken to the media, calling for the reform or abolition of safer supply, warning that the strategy is disastrous and further exacerbates the OxyContin crisis.
“None of them are in the film. Their advocacy work is completely ignored,” notes Zivo, who accused the Fifth Estate of attempting “to conceal, or dismiss” dissenting views. “The film barely discusses how organized crime and corrupt pharmacies profit off safer supply, or how diverted opioids harm communities.”
“In fact, it even suggests that diversion could be beneficial by filling the market with 'safe' drugs,” he continued, a claim strongly opposed by addiction doctors and police.
B.C.'s top doctor admitted in early 2024 that “safer supply” is not “fully evidence-based.” Premier David Eby then walked back his support of the program, owning up to public safety concerns.
Harm reduction proponents initially dismissed reports of widespread safer supply diversion as disinformation or minimized it, while addiction physicians feared speaking out due to potential backlash.
The Fifth Estate omitted victims harmed by safer supply diversion, as well as critical civil society figures and politicians. This appears intentional, claims Zivo. For instance, prominent critic B.C. MLA Elenore Sturko stated that the CBC contacted her for background but refused her interview request.
“In lieu of balanced reporting,” Zivo wrote, “the documentary almost exclusively spotlights addicts, progressive activists and harm reduction advocates, including some of the chief architects behind safer supply. This creates a wildly skewed — and factually inaccurate — retelling of how and why federal funding was cancelled.”
Addictions Minister Ya'ara Saks fearmongers over involuntary care for drug addicts proposed by Conservatives, claiming it's polarizing and driven by a "lack of evidence" before being corrected that even the BC NDP has changed its policies.https://t.co/rPoJJ4gQUI pic.twitter.com/XQBs8zOi2D
— Rebel News (@RebelNewsOnline) October 11, 2024
Zivo refutes the documentary's claim that safer supply is an evidence-based, widely supported policy. He argues that supporting studies are often poorly designed, relying on addict testimony or suffering from basic methodological flaws like uncontrolled confounding variables.
“Had The Fifth Estate had the integrity to include critical experts, this could have all been easily explained. It instead relentlessly pushed the narrative that cancelling safer supply was driven by ‘politics’ (aka: evil conservatives),” the columnist wrote.
“Their evidence for this claim?” he posed. “The harm reduction advocates said so, so it must be true.” The accompanying article mentions diversion only briefly, wrongly suggesting safer supply was cancelled for no reason.
A CBC spokesperson asserted that “the episode adheres to CBC’s Journalistic Standards and Practices and as such, we stand behind the journalism.”
Poilievre addresses the 49,000 Canadians who have died from overdoses during Trudeau's tenure as the Liberals fail to stop fentanyl 'superlabs'.
— Rebel News (@RebelNewsOnline) February 3, 2025
He calls Trump's tariffs "unjustified" but says a foreign leader shouldn't have to point out Canada's problems before we fix them. pic.twitter.com/kSLM6sugk9
B.C. has five of the country’s 31 federal safe injection sites but no minimum-distance rules from schools, daycares, or playgrounds — yet Health Minister Marjorie Michel claims this isn’t her responsibility.
In British Columbia, the 2023 decriminalization pilot project that allowed for public possession of up to 2.5 grams of narcotics was suspended just over a year after its launch due to rising public disorder.
There were 3,313 overdose deaths in the province from February 1, 2023, to May 7, 2024, a 16.5% increase over the 2,843 deaths in the 15 months before decriminalization, according to the B.C. Coroners Service.
Alex Dhaliwal
Journalist and Writer
Alex Dhaliwal is a Political Science graduate from the University of Calgary. He has actively written on relevant Canadian issues with several prominent interviews under his belt.
Help fund Alex's journalism!
COMMENTS
-
Bernhard Jatzeck commented 2025-11-18 21:01:51 -0500The CBC supports whatever the government does because it won’t bite the hand that feeds it. There’s more money in doing that. -
Bruce Atchison commented 2025-11-18 19:40:14 -0500Stupidity is irreparable.. CBC leftists insist on promoting bad government policies because they know who gives them money. That network would never survive on its own because leftists figure government must do everything for them.